Can e-Authentication Raise the Confidence of Both Students and Teachers in Qualifications Granted Through the e-Assessment Process?
The EU-funded TeSLA project - Adaptive Trust-based e-Assessment System for Learning (http://tesla-project.eu) has developed a suite of instruments for e-Authentication. These include face recognition, voice recognition, keystroke dynamics, forensic analysis and plagiarism detection were designed for integration within a university's virtual learning environment. These tools were trialed across the seven partner institutions: 4,058 participating students, including 330 Students with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND); 54 teaching staff.
This paper describes the findings of this large-scale study where over 50% of students gave a positive response to the use of these tools. In addition, over 70% agreed that these tools were 'to ensure that my examination results are trusted' and 'to prove that my essay is my own original work'. Teaching staff also reported positive experiences of TeSLA: the figure reaching 100% in one institution. We show there is evidence that a suite of e-authentication tools such as TeSLA can potentially be acceptable to students and staff and be used to increase trust in online assessment. Also, that whilst not yet perfected for SEND students it can still enrich their experience of assessment. We find that care is needed when introducing such technologies to ensure the building of the layers of trust required for their successful adoption.
Bañeres, D.; Baró, X; Guerrero, A.E.; Rodriguez, M.E. (2016) Towards an Adaptive e-Assessment System Based on Trustworthiness. Formative Assessment Learning Data Analytics and Gamification. Chp. 10., pp. 25-48. Elsevier. ISBN: 978-0-12-803637-2. 2016
Bartley, J.M. (2005). Assessment is as assessment does: A conceptual framework for understanding online assessment and measurement. Online assessment and measurement: Foundations and challenges, (pp..1-45). IGI Global.
Edwards, C., Whitelock, D., Okada, A., & Holmes, W. (2018). Trust in online authentication tools for online assessment in both formal and informal contexts. In L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez, & I. Candel Torres (Eds.), ICERI2018 Proceedings (pp. 3754–3762). Seville: IATED Academy.
ESG: European Students’ Union (ESU) (Belgium), European University Association (EUA) (Belgium), European Association of Institutions in Higher Education (EURASHE) (Belgium) and European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA) (Belgium) (2015). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG), Bruxelles, Belgium, European Students’ Union (Online). Available at http://www.esu-online.org
Innovation Alliance (2019). Academic integrity. http://www.innovationalliance.eu/de/1-0- understanding-academia/1-2-understanding-academics/1-2-2-academic-integrity/
McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2
Okada, A., Whitelock, D., Holmes, W., & Edwards, C. (2018). Student acceptance of online assessment with e-authentication in the UK. British Journal of Educational Technology, BJET, (Early access).
Van Veen, F., & Sattler, S. (2018). Modeling Updating of Perceived Detection Risk: The Role of Personal Experience, Peers, Deterrence Policies, and Impulsivity. Devient Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2018.1559409
Wade, M. J. and Breden, F. (1980) The Evolution of Cheating and Selfish Behavior, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 7(3), pp. 167–172. Available at: https://www-jstor-org.libezproxy.open.ac.uk/stable/4599323?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents (Accessed: 6 January 2020).
WGU (2020) Assessments allow students to prove their competency, University web site. Available at: https://www.wgu.edu/admissions/student-experience/assessments.html (Accessed: 6 January 2020).
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).