Recalibrating Institutional Choreographies for a Future Focused Education


  • Som Naidu University of South Pacific



Higher education, Future of education, Disruption, Technology


Contemporary educational institutions are experiencing disruptions to their modus operandi from a variety of sources. A changing student demographic across the higher education sector, along with their changing educational needs is driving much of this disruption. Other drivers are the need for different kinds of skill sets required in the contemporary workplace, the need for alternative methods of credentialing and a demand for flexibility in the education space. However, if you looked around for how prepared our contemporary educational institutions are for leading learning for the future, you are likely to be disappointed. This is not because our current educational system is broken en masse. In fact, there are plenty of examples of excellent practices all around us, but these are not enough. Our universities and educational systems continue to operate on outdated principles and practices. While they are willing to experiment with new models on the peripheries of their core business, most are not bold enough to rethink and reconfigure their mainstream processes. It is rare to find large-scale and enterprise-wide operations that are appropriately aligned to lead learning and teaching for the near and the long-term future. Why is this so? What can, and must be done about it? This paper examines potential areas of disruption, their key drivers, and where and how to begin a rethink and recalibration of how universities can create, capture and deliver value.


Baggaley, J. (2015). Flips and flops. Distance Education, 36, 437–447. DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2015.1041677.

Chai, C.-S., Koh, J. H.-L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31–51.

Dede, C. (2004). Enabling distributed-learning communities via emerging technologies.Proceedings of the 2004 Conference of the Society for Information Technology in Teacher Education (SITE), pp. 3-12. Charlottesville, VA: American Association for Computers in Education.

Gallagher, S., & Garrett, G. (2013). Disruptive education: Technology-enabled universities. Sydney: United States Studies Centre at the University of Sydney. Retrieved from

Global Learning Council. (2016). Technology-enhanced Learning: Best practices and data sharing in higher education. Retrieved from;

Halloran, L., & Friday, C. (2018). Can the universities of today lead learning for tomorrow? The University of the Future. Retrieved from (see

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108, 1017–1054. Retrieved from

Naidu, S. (2008). Enabling time, pace and place independence. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. G. van Merriënboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed.), (259-268), New York: Erlbaum.

Naidu, S. (2016a). Mainstreaming open, flexible, and distance learning. In K-W. Lai, S. Stein, P. Field, & K. Pratt (Eds.), Our world in your place: 30 years of distance learning and teaching at the University of Otago. (pp. 92-108). Dunedin, NZ: Distance Learning Office, University of Otago.

Naidu, S. (2016b). The case for open educational practice, Distance Education, 37(1), 1-3. DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2016.1157010.

Naidu, S. (2017a). How flexible is flexible learning, who is to decide and what are its implications? Distance Education, 38(3),

Naidu, S. (2017b). Open Educational Practice: Caveat emptor. In D. Singh & C. Stückelberger (Eds.), Ethics in higher education: Values-driven leaders for the future (pp. 287-305). Geneva:, ISBN 978-2-88931-164-4 (online version) ISBN 978-2-88931-165-1 (print version).

Naidu, S. (2019). Alternative Digital Credentials: Don’t reinvent the wheel, fix it if it’s broken! Connections. Retrieved from

Naidu, S., & Roberts, K. J. (2018). Future proofing higher education in the Pacific with open and flexible learning. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3), 280-295.

Rosenbloom, B. (2011). The disaggregated professor. Retrieved from

Saltzberg, S., & Polyson, S. (1995, September). Distributed learning on the World Wide Web. Syllabus, 9(1), 10.

Sams, A. (2010, December 16). The flipped classroom [Video file]. Retrieved from

Vrasidas, C., & Glass, G. V. (2002). Distance education and distributed learning. Greenwich, CT: Information Age. and Distributed Learning, 10(6), 21-50. Retrieved from



How to Cite

Naidu, S. (2019). Recalibrating Institutional Choreographies for a Future Focused Education. Journal of Learning for Development, 6(3).



Special Feature