Supporting Open Practices with Teachers in Zambia
Keywords:school-based professional development, learner-centred education, capacity development
This paper demonstrates how the features and affordances of open learning have been developed in new and productive ways to provide school-based continuing professional development for teachers in Zambia. It presents and critically reviews data from 200 teachers who have taken part in phase 1 of the Zambian Education School-based Training (ZEST) – a project which, over the next three years, will be scaled-up across Zambia. The project is underpinned by the belief that knowledge about teaching is co-constructed through participation in, and reflection on, practice. Thus, the emphasis is on empowering teachers to work together to develop practices appropriate to their context – open practices. In the study, we describe an on-going process of realist evaluation which enables us to establish at an early stage what works in which contexts and informs on-going project planning. It concludes that this approach to evaluation has the potential to be helpful in understanding open practices and how they can be developed.
Barrett, A. (2007). Beyond the polarisation of pedagogy: Models of classroom practice in Tanzanian primary schools. Comparative Education, 43(2), 273–294.
Borko, H., Davinroy, K., Carribeth, B., & Cumb, B. (2000). Exploring and supporting teacher change: Two third grade teachers’ experiences in a mathematics and literacy staff development project. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 273–306.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 249-305.
Dembele, M., & Miaro-II, B.-R. (2013). Pedagogical renewal and teacher development in sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and promising paths. In B. Moon (Ed.), Teacher education and the challenge of development: A global analysis (pp. 183–196). London: Routledge.
GPE. (2016). Global Partnership for Education Education Sector Program Implementation Grant (ESPIG). Retrieved from https://www.globalpartnership.org/sites/default/files/2016-11-gpe-isr-zambia.pdf
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximising impact on learning. Abingdon: Routledge.
Korthagen, F. (2017). Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: Towards Professional Development 3.0. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(4), 387–405.
Malderez, A., Hobson, A., Tracey, L., & Kerr, K. (2007). Becoming a student teacher: Core features of the experience. European Journal of Teacher Education, 30(3), 225–248.
May, C., & Finch, T. (2009). Implementing, Embedding and integrating practices: An outline of Normalisation Process Theory. Sociology, 43(3), 535–554.
Murphy, P., & Wolfenden, F. (2013). Developing a pedagogy of mutuality in a capability approach: Teachers’ experiences of using the Open Educational Resources (OER) of the teacher education in sub-Saharan Africa (TESSA) programme. International Journal of Educational Development, 33, 263–271.
O’Sullivan, M. (2004). The reconceptualisation of learner-centred approaches: A Namibian case study. International Journal of Educational Development, 24(6), 585–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-0593(03)00018-X
Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2005). Realist review – A new method of systematic review designed for complex policy intervention. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(1), 21–34.
Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London, UK: Sage.
Polly, D., & Hannafin, M. (2011). Examining how learner-centred professional developmentinfluences teachers’ espoused and enacted practices. Journal of Educational Research, 104, 120–130.
Schweisfurth, M. (2011). Learner-centred education in developing country contexts: From solution to problem? International Journal of Educational Development, 31(5), 419–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.03.005
Schweisfurth, M. (2013). Learner-centred education in international perspective: Whose pedagogy for whose development? Abingdon: Routledge.
Schweisfurth, M. (2015). Learner-centred pedagogy: Towards a post 2015 agenda for teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 259–266.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.
Shulman, L., & Shulman, J. (2007). How and what teachers learn; A shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 257–271.
Stutchbury, K., Dickie, J., & Wambugu, P. (2018). Teacher education in sub-Saharan Africa in one school in Kenya: Macro challenges and micro changes. In K. Safford (Ed.), Learning and teaching around the world: Comparative and international studies in primary education. (pp. 163-171). London: Routledge.
USAID. (n.d.). Meeting EFA: Zambia Community Schools [Case Study]. Retrieved from https://www.epdc.org/sites/default/files/documents/Zambia%20Community%20Schools.pdf
Vavrus, F. (2009). The cultural politics of constructivist pedagogy: Teacher education reforms in the Republic of Tanzania. International Journal of Educational Development, 29, 303–311.
Vavrus, F. (2011). Ensuring quality by attending to inquiry: Learner-centred practices in sub-Saharan Africa (No. 4). Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002160/216063e.pdf
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher pyschological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).