Implementing a Blended/Online Learning Policy on a Face-to-Face Campus: Perspectives of Administrators and Implications for Change
Many universities are currently exploring the factors that impact implementation of blended learning policies and institutions. In the Caribbean this is particularly important as financial support by Governments in the region has dwindled in the context of a global recession and universities are seeking ways to reduce costs and increase access. The vision for blended learning on one Campus of a multi-campus, higher education institution in the Caribbean, was to enhance teaching and learning by offering students and staff greater flexibility, more opportunities for engagement and wider choices consistent with varying teaching and learning styles and needs. As this multi-campus university moves toward a re-engineered online policy and greater collaboration among the campuses, some administrators have expressed the view that they have been left out of the implementation strategies and are not clear on the status of the blended learning policy on their campus, nor their roles and responsibilities. This is a qualitative case study, focusing on the stage of blended learning implementation and the perceptions of Deans and Administrative Officers at a specific Higher Education Institution. The methods used were, review of the use of the Learning Management System, and interviews conducted with Deans and Administrative Officers. Thick descriptions of perceptions of administrators are provided. The implications of their perceptions for implementation are discussed and recommendations to close gaps where they exist are made. Findings confirm that change management strategies are required, such as establishing a sense of urgency, forming a powerful guiding coalition and creating a vision. Administrators need to provide clear direction on who should lead the initiative and senior management has a role in ensuring there is additional team support to increase programme development. Findings also indicate that while blended learning has the potential to reduce costs to Higher Education institutions, initial investments in software, hardware, appropriate staff and training require financial investments. Administrators have a role to play in sourcing funds for implementation of blended learning and also in performing audits, which can help in providing information on the existing technical skills, hardware and software available on the campus and how they are being used.
AB P. 27 Extract Minutes of a Meeting of Academic Board held on Thursday 19th January 2012 at 13.00 hours in the Conference Room, New Student Administration Building 2012.
Bates, T. (2017, June 10). Online learning and distance education resources. https://www.tonybates.ca/tag/blended-learning/
Benson, V., & Anderson, D. (2010). Colloquium: Towards a strategic approach to the introduction of blended learning: Challenges faced and lessons learned. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), E129-E131.
Blended Learning Committee (2011). Blended Learning Policy of the St. Augustine campus. UWI St Augustine.
Boone, J. (2015). Leading Learning Organizations through Transformational Change: Making the Case for Blended Learning. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(3) pp. 275-283, doi: 10.1108/IJEM-06-2013-0096. Permanent link to this document: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-06-2013-0096
CETL Blended Learning Team (2017). Blended learning at The UWI St Augustine (2012-2016).
Crew, S., & Crew, V. (2018). Models of Change in Higher Education. In Shin, J.C & P. Teixeira (Eds.). Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Dordretcht: Springer Science and Business.
Duarte, A. (2016). Blended learning: Institutional frameworks for adoption and implementation. University of the Incarnate Word, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2016. 10241315.
Edwards-Henry, A., Thurab-Nkhosi, D., & Wood-Jackson, A. (2005). Quality Assurance in Online Learning at the University of The West Indies: A Baseline Survey of Online Courses. Fourth Pan Commonwealth Forum on Open Learning. Retrieved November 30, 2017 from http://pcf4.dec.uwi.edu/viewpaper.php?id=160
Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A Framework for Institutional Adoption and Implementation of Blended Learning in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.00
Kotter, P. (1995). Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail. Harvard Business Review, January 2007. pp. 96-103.
Poon, J. (2013). Blended Learning: An Institutional Approach for Enhancing Students' Learning Experiences. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2). http://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/poon_0613.htm
Porter, W. (2014). Institutional adoption of blended learning in higher education. Brigham Young University BYU Scholars Archive. Retrieved June 17, 2017 http://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6761&context=etd
The University Office of Planning (2017). The UWI Triple A Strategic Plan 2017-2022: Revitalizing Caribbean Development. Approved at the Annual Business Meeting of University Council April 27, 2017, The UWI, Cave Hill Campus.
The University of the West Indies (n.d.). Strategic transformation for relevance, impact, distinctiveness and excellence. St Augustine, Trinidad: UWI St Augustine.
The University of the West Indies (2007). Consensus on policy for online, distance and multimode learning. (Working group report 30 July 2007).
The University of the West Indies (2010). Statistical review academic year 2008/9. Mona, Jamaica: UWI.
Twigg, C. A. (2003. September/October). Improving Learning and Reducing Costs: New Models for Online Learning. Educause. 28-38.
Zephyrine, J. (2016). The UWI blended learning needs and impact assessment report 2016: Assessment of faculty training initiatives in teaching and learning. Internal Report.
Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Learning for Development - JL4D
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).