Willingness to Engage in Open Educational Practices among Academics in Rwandan Public Higher Education and Responsive Actions
Academics’ engagement in Open Educational Practices (OEPs) is critical for opening up higher education. It is in this perspective that the willingness to engage in such practices among academics in Rwandan public higher education was investigated with an agenda to trigger responsive actions. Via convenience/availability and volunteer sampling, 170 academics were invited to participate in the study and 85 of them completed and returned an email self-completion questionnaire. The results revealed that the majority of participants were willing to contribute to Open Educational Resources (OER) by publishing their work under an open licence. Participants were also willing to engage in diverse OEPs including 1) finding OER and evaluating their quality, 2) participating in and evaluating open courses, 3) aggregating OER, 4) adapting OER and open courses, and 5) assessing accomplishment from open learning based on OER and open courses for credit. National and institutional policies were found to be the potentially most important enablers of academics’ engagement in those practices. In the light of the findings, the researcher argues that the inclusion of more learners in the higher education system would make academics more impactful than simply the citation of their work, a stance that was reflected in subsequent responsive actions. This study may benefit institutions and policy makers who are interested in opening up higher education, especially the University of Rwanda that is expected to contribute significantly to the transformation of the country into a middle-income, knowledge-based society.
Atkins, D.E., Brown, J.S., & Hammond, A.S. (2007). A review of the open educational resources movement: Achievement, challenges and new opportunities. Retrieved January 23, 2017, from this URL.
Badarch, D., Knyazeva, S., & Lane, A. (2012). Introducing the opportunities and challenges of OER: The case of the Commonwealth of Independent States and the Baltic States. In J. Glennie, K. Harley, N. Butcher, & T.V. Wyk, (Eds.), Open educational resources and changes in higher education: Reflection from practice. Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning.
Bateman, P., Lane, A., & Moon, B. (2012). Out of Africa: A typology for analysing Open Educational Resources initiatives. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. Retrieved January 22, 2017, from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/2012-11/
Bates, T. (2012, August 5). What’s right and what’s wrong about Coursera-style MOOCs. Retrieved January 22, 2017, from http://www.tonybates.ca/2012/08/05/whats-right-and-whats-wrong-about-coursera-style-moocs/
Benson, V., Anderson, D., & Ooms, A. (2011). Educators’ perceptions, attitudes and practices: Blended learning in business and management education. Research in Learning Technology, 19 (2), 143-154. Retrieved January 22, 2017, from http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/10353/11979
Bijsterveld, C., & Dopper, S. (2012). Integrating open educational resources into the curriculum. In R. Jacobi, & V.D.N. Woert (Eds.), Trend report: Open educational resources 2012 (pp. 17-24). Retrieved January 13, 2017, from https://www.surfspace.nl/media/bijlagen/artikel-697-ee18ac0f1441bb158e6122818f5f589e.pdf
Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Butcher, N. (2011). A basic guide to Open Educational Resources (OER). Retrieved January 22, 2017, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002158/215804e.pdf
Calver, M., & Beattie, A. (2015, May 31). Our observation with metrics is corrupting science. The conversation. Retrieved January 22, 2017, from http://theconversation.com/our-obsession-with-metrics-is-corrupting-science-39378
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Oxford: Routledge.
Conole, G. (2013). Designing for learning in an open world. New York: Springer.
David, M., & Sutton, D.C. (2011). Social research: An introduction (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Dennis, B. (2009). Theory of the margins: Liberating research in education. In R. Winkle-Wagner, A.C., Hunter, & H.D. Ortloff (Eds.), Bridging the gap between theory and practice in educational research: Methods at the margins. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 63-75.
Denscombe, M. (2010). The good research guide for small-scale social research projects (4th ed.). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
Ehlers, U. (2011). From Open Educational Resources to Open Educational Practices. eLearning Papers (21). Retrieved January 24, 2017, from http://www.oerup.eu/fileadmin/_oerup/dokumente/media25161__2_.pdf
Geser, G. (2007). Open educational practices and resources: OLCOS roadmap 2012. Retrieved January 23, 2017, from http://www.olcos.org/cms/upload/docs/olcos_roadmap.pdf
Hall, C.M., & Page, S.J. (2015). Following the impact factor: Utilitarianism or academic compliance?. Tourism Management, 51. Retrieved January 23, 2017, from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261517715001089
Haustein, S., & Larivière, V. (2015). The use of bibliometrics for assessing research: Possibilities, limitations and adverse effects. In M.I. Welpe, J. Wollersheim, S. Ringelhan, & M. Osterloh (Eds.), Incentives and performance: Governance of research organizations. New York: Springer.
Hvistendahl, M. (2013). China’s publication bazaar, Science 342 (6162), 1035-1039. Retrieved January 23, 2017, from https://www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6162/1035.full
International Council for Open and Distance Education. (n.d.). Definition of open educational practices. Retrieved November 26, 2015, from http://www.icde.org/en/resources/open_educational_practices/definition_of_open_educational_practices/
Jansen, J. (2015, October 15). UFS responds to concerns around high costs of higher education. Retrieved January 23, 2017, from http://www.ufs.ac.za/template/news-archive-item?news=6526
Kincheloe, L.J., & McLaren, P. (2005). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In K.N. Denzin, & S.Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publishing Inc.
Lane, A. (2009). The impact of openness on bridging educational digital divides. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10. Retrieved January 22, 2017, from http://oro.open.ac.uk/24791/1/IRRODL_2009.pdf
Lane, A. (2010). Global trends in the development and use of open educational resources to reform educational practices. Retrieved January 23, 2017, from http://iite.unesco.org/pics/publications/en/files/3214676.pdf
Liyanagunawardena, T., Williams, S., & Adams, A. (2013). The impact and reach of MOOCs: A developing countries’ perspective. eLearning Papers (33). Retrieved January 22, 2017, from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/32452/
Matthews, D. (2015, November 5). Lost credibility. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved November 23, 2017, from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/11/05/editorial-says-journal-impact-factors-have-lost-credibility?utm_content=buffer0162a&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&utm_campaign=IHEbuffer
McAndrew, P., Farrow, R., Law, P., & Elliott-Cirigottis, G. (2012). Learning the lesson of openness. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. Retrieved January 24, 2017, from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/2012-10/
Nkuyubwatsi, B. (2016a). A critical look at the policy environment for opening up public higher education in Rwanda. The Journal of Learning for Development, 3(2), 47-61. Retrieved October 10, 2017, from http://www.jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/141
Nkuyubwatsi, B. (2016b). The outcome of constructive alignment between open educational services and learners' needs, employability and capabilities development: Heutagogy and transformative migration among underprivileged learners in Rwanda. Cogent Education, 3(1). DOI:10.1080/2331186X.2016.1198522. Retrieved October 10, 2017, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1198522
Nkuyubwatsi, B. (2016c). Positioning extension Massive Open Online Courses (xMOOCs) within the Open Access and the lifelong learning agendas in a developing setting. The Journal of Learning for Development, 3(1), 14-36. Retrieved April 17, 2016, from http://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d
Nkuyubwatsi, B., Ndayishimiye, V., Ntirenganya, B.J., & Umwungerimwiza, D.Y. (2015). Towards innovation in digital and open scholarship for non-rivalrous lifelong learning and supporting Open Learning: The case of the Open Scholars Network. eLearning Papers (44), 53-59. Retrieved April 17, 2016, from http://openeducationeuropa.eu/en/paper/teacher-s-role-educationalinnovation
OECD. (2007). Giving knowledge for free: The emergence of open educational resources. Retrieved January 24, 2017, from http://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/38654317.pdf
Omollo, K.L., Rahman, A., & Yebuah, C.A. (2012). Producing OER from scratch: The case of Health Sciences at the University of Ghana and the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology. In J. Glennie, K. Harley, N. Butcher, & T.V. Wyk (Eds.), Open educational resources and changes in higher education: Reflection from practice. Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning. pp. 57-73.
Ramaker, R., & Wijkhuijs, J. (2015, January 29). The fight for open access. Univers. Retrieved January 26, 2017, from https://universonline.nl/2015/01/29/the-fight-for-open-access
Rennie, F., & Mason, R. (2010). Designing higher education courses using Open Educational Resources. In M.S. Khine, & I.M. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning: Cognition, computers and collaboration in education. New York: Springer. pp. 273-282.
Seale, C. (2012). Sampling. In Seale, C. (Ed), Researching society and culture (3rd ed.). London: Sage, pp. 134-152.
Taiwo, A.A., & Downe, G.L. (2013). The Theory of User Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): A Meta-analytic review of empirical findings. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 49(1). Retrieved October 3, 2017, from http://www.jatit.org/volumes/Vol49No1/7Vol49No1.pdf
Turabik, T., & Baskan, A.G. (2015). The importance of motivation theories in terms of education systems. 5th World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Educational Leadership, WCLTA 2014. Retrieved October 2, 2017 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042815022661
Weller, M. (2014). The battle for open: How openness won and why it doesn’t feel like victory, London: Ubiquity Press. Retrieved January 24, 2017, from http://www.ubiquitypress.com/site/books/detail/11/battle-for-open/
Whiteman, N. (2012). Undoing ethics: Rethinking practice in online research. New York: Springer.
Wijkhuijs, J. (2015, July 2). Dutch universities start their Elsevier boycott plan. Univers. Retrieved January 24, 2017, from https://universonline.nl/2015/07/02/dutch-universities-start-their-elsevier-boycott-plan
Wolfenden, F. (2012). OER production and adaptation through networking across Sub-Saharan Africa: Learning from TESSA. In J. Glennie, K. Harley, N. Butcher, & T.V. Wyk (Eds.), Open educational resources and changes in higher education: Reflection from practice. Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning. pp. 91-105.
Wolfenden, F., Buckler, A., & Keraro, F. (2012). OER Adaptation and reuse across cultural contexts in Sub Saharan Africa: Lessons from TESSA (Teacher Education in Sub Saharan Africa). Journal of Interactive Media in Education. Retrieved January 23, 2017, from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/2012-03/
Wyk, T.V. (2012). Taking OER beyond the OER Community: Policy issues and priority. In J. Glennie, K. Harley, N. Butcher, & T.V. Wyk (Eds.), Open educational resources and changes in higher education: Reflection from practice. Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning. pp. 13-25.
Copyright (c) 2017 Journal of Learning for Development - JL4D
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).