Pre-Service Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs Towards Educational Technologies Integration in Tanzania
This study examines pre-service teachers’ (N = 386) self-efficacy beliefs towards educational technologies integration in the classroom at the two colleges in Tanzania that prepare secondary education teachers. Using regression analysis, the study found out that the determinants of self-efficacy beliefs among pre-service teachers towards educational technologies integration are support, perceived ease of use, performance expectancy, and social influence. The findings of this study enhance our understanding of factors that hinder teachers from integrating educational technologies into the classroom.
Abbitt, J. T. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs about technology integration and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) among preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(4), 134–143. http://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2011.10784670
Albion, P. (1999). Self-efficacy beliefs as an indicator of teachers’ preparedness for teaching with technology. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education (SITE 1999) (pp. 1602–1608). http://doi.org/10.1007/s10876-009-0253-6
Albion, P. (2001). Some factors in the development of self-efficacy beliefs for computer use among teacher education students. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(3), 321–347.
Andersson, B., Nfuka, E. N., Sumra, S., Uimonen, P., & Pain, A. (2014). Evaluation of implementation of ICT in Teachers’ Colleges Project in Tanzania.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191– 215. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In Annals of child development. Six theories of child development (Vol. 6, pp. 1–60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Chen, L.-L. (2004). Pedagogical strategies to increase pre-service teachers’ confidence in computer learning. Educational Technology & Society, 7(3), 50–60.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–333.
CSSC. (2014). The performance enhancement by e-learning for secondary schools.
Curts, J., Tanguma, J., & Peña, C. M. (2008). Predictors of Hispanic school teachers’ self-efficacy in the pedagogical uses of technology. Computers in the Schools, 25(1–2), 48–63. http://doi.org/10.1080/07380560802157766
De, E. H., Uçar, M. B., & Demir, C. (2014). The investigation of self-efficacy of pre-service science teachers and pre-service physics teachers towards web pedagogical content knowledge regarding internet use habits. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3395–3399. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.771
Ertmer, P.A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., & York, C. S. (2007). Exemplary technology-using teachers: perceptions of factors influencing success. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(2), 55–61.
Foster, J. J. (2001). Data analysis using SPSS for Windows Versions 8-10: A beginner’s guide. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Giles, R. M., & Kent, A. M. (2016). An investigation of preservice teachers’ self-efficacy for teaching with technology. Asian Education Studies, 1(1), 32-40. http://doi.org/10.20849/aes.v1i1.19
Govender, D., & Govender, I. (2009). The relationship between information and communications technology (ict) integration and teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs about ict. Education as Change, 13(1), 153-165. http://doi.org/10.1080/16823200902943346
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJL: Prentice Hall.
Higgins, C. A., & Compeau, D. R. (1995). Development of a Measure and Initial Test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189- 211. http://doi.org/10.2307/249688
Kafyulilo, A., Fisser, P., Pieters, J., & Voogt, J. (2015). ICT Use in science and mathematics teacher education in tanzania: developing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 381-399.
Kaiser, H. F. (1973). An Index of Factorial Simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-34. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ105008
Kazoka, L. (2016, December 3). Tanzania: Halotel offers free Internet to 400 schools. Tanzania Daily News. Dar es Salaam. Retrieved from http://allafrica.com/stories/201609150157.html
Kihoza, P., Zlotnikova, I., Bada, J., & Kalegele, K. (2016). Classroom ICT integration in Tanzania: Opportunities and challenges from the perspectives of TPACK and SAMR models. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 12(1), 107-128.
Lwoga, E. (2012). Making learning and Web 2.0 technologies work for higher learning institutions in Africa. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 29(2), 90-107. http://doi.org/10.1108/10650741211212359
Mtebe, J. S., & Kissaka, M. M. (2015). Heuristics for evaluating usability of learning management systems in Africa. In P. Cunningham & M. Cunningham (Eds.). IST-Africa 2015 Conference Proceedings (pp. 1-13).
Lilongwe, Malawi. Mtebe, J. S., Mbwilo, B., & Kissaka, M. M. (2016). Factors influencing teachers’ use of multimedia enhanced content in secondary schools in Tanzania. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 65–84.
Mtebe, J. S., & Raisamo, R. (2014). Investigating perceived barriers to the use of Open Educational Resources in higher education in Tanzania. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(2), 43-65.
MWTC. (2016). National Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Policy. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Retrieved from https://tanzict.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/national-ict-policy-proofed-final-nic-review- 2.pdf
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Raphael, C., & Mtebe, J. S. (2016). Instructor support services: An inevitable critical success factor in blended learning in higher education in Tanzania. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 12(2), 123-138.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York, USA. Tanzania TELECOMS. (2016, July 31). 700 Schools in Tanzania to be Connected to the Internet. Dar Es Salaam. Retrieved from http://tanzaniainvest.com/telecoms/schools-internet-connectivity-tigo
Teo, T. (2009). Examining the relationship between student teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and their intended uses of technology for teaching: A structural equation modelling approach. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 8(4), 7-15.
UNESCO. (2015). ICT competency standards for teachers: competency standards modules. Retrieved from http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/ev.php-URL_ID=25731&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365. 210
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Hall, M., Davis, G. B., Davis, F. D., & Walton, S. M. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view 1. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178.
Copyright (c) 2017 Journal of Learning for Development - JL4D
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).