The Two Solitudes of Educational Policy and the Challenge of Development

  • Stephen J Murgatroyd Collaborative Media Group Inc.
  • Pasi Sahlberg Harvard Graduate School of Education
Keywords: Equity, Policy, Market Choice, Neoliberal, Evidence Based Decisions

Abstract

Policy makers are challenged to improve educational outcomes, manage scarce resources and secure public acceptance of their initiatives to provide quality, relevant and effective education. In making decisions they are pulled between competing ideologies about the process and purposes of schooling. This paper explores these ideologies and suggests tensions between them. The paper also suggests a way forward for those seeking to established evidence based, context sensitive policies and practices

Author Biographies

Stephen J Murgatroyd, Collaborative Media Group Inc.

Stephen Murgatroyd, PhD  worked at The Open University, Athabasca University and Axia NetMedia as an researcher, writer, innovator, consultant and entrepreneur. He now runs a technology and consulting company, based in Edmonton Alberta. He is the author of some thirty-five books and over 200 academic papers. He is also Chief Innovation Officer for Contact North|Contact Nord.

Pasi Sahlberg, Harvard Graduate School of Education

Pasi Sahlberg, PhD is a Finnish educator, author and scholar. He has worked as a schoolteacher, teacher educator, researcher and policy advisor in Finland and has studied education systems and reforms around the world. He is a former Director General of CIMO (Centre for International Mobility and Cooperation) at the Finland’s Ministry of Education and Culture in Helsinki, former officer of the World Bank and the European Training Foundation and is currently a visiting Professor of Practice at Harvard University’s Graduate School of Education in Cambridge, MA, USA.

References

Ash, P.BZ. 2014 OECD – Poverty Explains 46% of PISA Scores. Education Week, March 28th Retrieved from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/assessing_the_assessments/2014/03/poverty_PISA_scores.html?r=214197038&preview=1 (Accessed July 10th 2014).

Birdsall, N. (1999) Globalization and the Developing Countries: The Inequality Risk. Remarks at Overseas Development Council Conference, Making Globalization Work, International Trade Center, Washington, D.C., March 18 available at http://www.econ.yale.edu/alumni/reunion99/birdsall.htm (Accessed 26th October 2013).

Darling-Hammond, L. (2010) The Flat World and Education – How America’s Commitment to Equity Will Determine our Future. New York: Teachers College Press.

Duncan, G. & Murnane, R. (2011). Whither Opportunity? Rising Inequality and the Uncertain Life Chances of Low-Income Children. New York City: Russell Sage.

Engel, A. (2007) Exposing The Myths of High Stakes Testing. Blog Post Available at http://www.angelaengel.com/high-stakes-testing/12-exposing-the-myths (accessed 24th October 2013)

Giddins, A. (1998) The Third Way. London: Polity.

Goldman, L. (2013) The Life of R H Tawney. London: Bloomsbury.

Hargreaves, A. and Shirley, D. (2009) The Fourth Way – The Inspiring Future for Educational Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Hanushek, E. and Wöβman, L. (2010) Education and Economic Growth. In Paterson, P., Baker, E. McGaw, B. [eds] International Encyclopaedia of Education (Volume II). Oxford: Elsevier at pages 245-252. Available at http://hanushek.stanford.edu/publications/education-and-economic-growth (Retrieved August 25th 2014).

Klein, N. (2007) The Shock Doctrine. New York: Metropolitan Press.

Lincove, J. A. (2009) Are Markets Good for Girls? The World Bank and Neoliberal Reforms in Developing Countries. Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, Winter/Spring pages 59-75.

Microsoft (2006) Strategies for Learning and Skills Development in Emerging Markets. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Corporation.

Murgatroyd, S. and Couture, J-C. (2013) Rethinking Equity – Creating a Great School for All. New York: Lulu Press.

Murgatroyd, S. (2010) Wicked Problems and the Work of the School. Journal of Educational Change, Vol. 45(2), pages 259-279.

OECD (2010) Policy Brief – Ten Steps to Equity in Education. Paris: OECD.

OECD (2013) OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well Being. Paris: OECD.

Ravitch, D. (2013) Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America’s Public Schools. New York: Knopf.

Sahlberg, P. (2006) Educational Reform for Raising Economic Competitiveness. Journal of Educational Change, Volume 7, pages 259-287.

Sahlberg, P. (2015) Finnish Lessons – What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland? [2nd Edition] New York: Teachers College Press.

Sanchez, A. (2010) The Education Shock Doctrine – Disaster Schooling. International Socialist Review, Issue 71 available at http://isreview.org/issue/71/education-shock-doctrine (Retrieved 10th August 2014).

Tooley, J and Dixon, P (2005) Private Education in Good for the Poor – A Study of Private Schools Serving the Poor in Low Income Countries. Washington, DC: Cato Institute (mimeo).

UNESCO (1996) Learning – The Treasures Within. Report to UNESCO from the Commission on Education for the Twenty First Century (Delors Commission Report). Paris: UNESCO.

Vandenberghe, V. (1999) Combining Market and Bureaucratic control in Education: an answer to market and bureaucratic failure? Comparative Education Volume 35 pages 277-8.

Verger, A. and Altinyelken, H.K. (2013) Global Education Reforms and the Management of Teachers – A Critical Introduction. In Verger, A., Altinyelken, H. and de Koning, M. [eds] (2013) Global Managerial Reforms and Teachers – Emerging Policies, Controversies and Issues in Developing Contexts. Amsterdam: Education International Research Institute.

World Bank (2011) Learning for All – Investing in Peoples Knowledge and Skills for Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Published
2016-11-10
How to Cite
Murgatroyd, S. J., & Sahlberg, P. (2016). The Two Solitudes of Educational Policy and the Challenge of Development. Journal of Learning for Development , 3(3). Retrieved from https://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/147
Section
Commentary