Positioning extension Massive Open Online Courses (xMOOCs) within the open access and the lifelong learning agendas in a developing setting
Recent reports on xMOOCs indicated that underprivileged learners in need for higher education have minimally been reached by these courses. While the open access agenda is needed to reach such learners, most MOOCs were developed from societies that shifted toward the lifelong learning agenda. In this paper, xMOOCs are positioned in both the open access and the lifelong learning agendas in a developing country context. Findings from ten xMOOCs are presented and discussed. The findings suggested that two of the ten xMOOCs may contribute directly to the open access agenda and two xMOOCs may contribute indirectly to the same agenda. Nine xMOOCs were found to have the potential to contribute to the lifelong learning agenda. These findings may inform policies and practices that underpin opening up higher education and open education in general.
Achieve (2011). Rubrics for evaluating Open Educational Resource (OER) objects. Retrieved January 11, 2015, from http://www.achieve.org/files/AchieveOERRubrics.pdf
Alcorn, B., Christensen, G. & Emanuel, J.E. (2014, January 4). Who take MOOCs?: For higher education, the devil is in the data, New Republic, Retrieved May 6, 2015, from http://www.newrepublic.com/article/116013/mooc-student-survey-who-enrolls-online-education
Anderson, T. (2010). Theories for learning with emerging technologies. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.),
Emerging technologies in distance education (pp. 23-39). Edmonton: Athabasca University Press. Retrieved May 13, 2015, from http://www.aupress.ca/books/120177/ebook/02_Veletsianos_2010-Emerging_Technologies_in_Distance_Education.pdf
Anderson, A., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J. & Lescovec, J. (2014). Engaging with Massive
Open Online Courses. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 687-698). Retrieved May 10, 2015, from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2568042
Andrei, M. (2014, October 1). Germany removes university fees: what we should learn from that. ZME Science. Retrieved May 8, 2015, from http://www.zmescience.com/other/germany-education-fees-01102014/
Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and
self-determined learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 56-71. Retrieved May 1, 2015, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1076/2113
Blom, J., Verma, H., Li, N., Skevi, A. & Dillenbourg, P. (2013). MOOCs are more social than
you believe, eLearning Papers. Retrieved May 5, 2015, from https://oerknowledgecloud.org/sites/oerknowledgecloud.org/files/From-field_33_1.pdf
Bouma, D.G. & Ling, R. (2004). The Research Process (5th edn). Victoria: Oxford University Press.
Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods (4th edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Canning, N. (2010). Playing with heutagogy: Exploring strategies to empower mature learners in
higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34(1), 59-71.
Canning, N. & Callan, S. (2010). Heutagogy: Spirals of reflection to empower learners in higher education. Reflective Practice, 11(1), 71-82.
Cisel, M. (n.d). Guide du MOOC. Retrieved May 4, 2015, from http://www.france-universite-numerique.fr/IMG/pdf/guide_mooc_complet_vf.pdf
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methods in Education (7th edn). Oxon:
Conole, G. (2013). MOOCs as disruptive technologies: Strategies for enhancing the learner
experience and quality of MOOCs. Revista de Educación a Distancia. Retrieved May 3, 2015, from http://www.um.es/ead/red/39/conole.pdf
Conole, G. (2014). A new classification for MOOCs. International Journal for Innovation and Quality in Learning. Retrieved May 3, 2015, from http://papers.efquel.org/index.php/innoqual/article/view/164
Creswell, W.J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4edn). Los Angeles: Sage.
Daniel, J.S. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musing in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. Retrieved May 4, 2015, from http://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/2012-18/
EADTU (2014). Porto declaration on European MOOCs: Europe must seize this moment to grab
the opportunities offered by MOOCs. Retrieved May 3, 2015, from http://home.eadtu.eu/images/News/Porto_Declaration_on_European_MOOCs_Final.pdf
Grainger, B. (2013). Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) report. Retrieved May 4, 2015, from http://www.londoninternational.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/mooc_report-2013.pdf
Guo, J.P. & Reinecke, K. (2014). Demographic differences in how students navigate through
MOOCs. Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning (pp. 21-30). Retrieved May 5, 2015, from https://groups.csail.mit.edu/uid/other-pubs/las2014-pguo-demographic.pdf
Harishankar, V.B. (2012). Tracing the trajectory of OER in India: Reflection on three initiatives.
In J. Glennie, K. Harley, N. Butcher, & T.V. Wyk (eds), Open Educational Resources and changes in higher education: Reflection from practice (pp. 41-56). Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning.
Hase, S. & Kenyon, C. (2001). From andragogy to heutagogy. Retrieved May 4, 2015, from http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/pr/Heutagogy.html
Heller, E.D. & Roger, R. K. (2006). Shifting the burden: Public and private financing of higher
education in the United States and implications for Europe. Tertiary Education and Management 12(2), 91-117. Retrieved May 4, 2015, from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13583883.2006.9967162
Home (2014). Open call for position papers on MOOCs. Retrieved May 4, 2015, from http://www.home.eadtu.eu/images/News/Open_Call_Position_paper_MOOCs_Update_8Sept.pdf
Iversity (2013, September 23). ECTS credits for MOOCs on Iversity. Retrieved May 4, 2015, from https://iversity.org/blog/ects-credits-moocs-iversity/
Jacobi, R. & Woert, N.V.D. (2012). Trend report: Open Educational Resources 2012. Retrieved May 14, 2015, from https://www.surfspace.nl/media/bijlagen/artikel-697-ee18ac0f1441bb158e6122818f5f589e.pdf
Kjeldstad, B., Alvestrand, H., Elvestad, O.E., Ingebretsen, T., Melve, I., Bongo, M. et al. (2014).
MOOCs for Norway: New digital learning methods in higher education. Retrieved May 1, 2015, from http://www.regjeringen.no/pages/38804804/PDFS/NOU201420140005000EN_PDFS.pdf
Koller, D. (2012). What we’re learning from online education. TED. Retrieved May 4, 2015, from http://www.ted.com/talks/daphne_koller_what_we_re_learning_from_online_ education.html
Kopp, M., Ebner, M. & Dofer-Novak, A. (2014). Introducing MOOCs to Austrian universities: Is it worth it to accept the challenge?. The International Journal of Innovation and Quality in Learning, 46-52. Retrieved May 12, 2015, from http://papers.efquel.org/index.php/innoqual/article/view/154/41
Lane, L. M. (2012). Three kinds of MOOCs [Web log post]. Retrieved April 29, 2015, from
Lane, A. & Van Dorp, K.J. (2011). Open educational resources and widening participation in higher education: Innovations and lessons from open universities. EDULEARN11, the 3rd annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies. Retrieved April 16, 2015, from http://oro.open.ac.uk/29201/1/OPEN_EDUCATIONAL_RESOURCES_AND_WIDENING_PARTICIPATION_andy.pdf
Liyanagunawardena, T., Williams, S. & Adams, A. (2013). The Impact and reach of MOOCs: A developing countries’ perspective. eLearning Papers (33). Retrieved May 13, 2015, from http://www.openeducationeuropa.eu/en/article/The-Impact-and-Reach-of-MOOCs%3A-A-Developing-Countries%E2%80%99-Perspective?paper=124335
Matherly, J. (2014). All devices connected to the Internet. Retrieved May 12, 2015, from
Mulder, F. (2015). Open(ing up) education for all…Boosted by MOOCs?. In C. J. Bonk, M.M. Lee, T.C. Reeves & T.H. Reynolds (eds.), MOOCs and open education around the world (pp. xviii- xxvii). London: Routledge.
Mulder, F. & Janssen, B. (2013) Opening up education. In R. Jacobi, H. Jelgerhuis & V.D. N. Woert (eds), Trend Report: Open Educational Resources 2013 (pp. 36-42). Retrieved May 11, 2015, from https://www.surf.nl/binaries/content/assets/surf/en/knowledgebase/2013/Trend+Report+OER+2013_EN_DEF+07032013+%28HR%29.pdf
National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (2014). Characteristics of households and housing:
Fourth population and housing census, Rwanda, 2012. Retrieved May 14, 2015, from http://statistics.gov.rw/publications/rphc4-thematic-report-characteristics-households-and-housing
Nkuyubwatsi, B. (2014a). Cultural translation in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). eLearning Papers (37), 23-32. Retrieved May 13, 2015, from http://www.openeducationeuropa.eu/en/paper/experiences-and-best-practices-and-around-moocs
Nkuyubwatsi, B. (2014b). Mapping five Os for reaping benefits from Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Journal Of Global Literacies, Technologies and Emerging Pedagogies, 2 (3), 189-206. Retrieved May 13, 2015, from http://joglep.com/index.php/archives/voulme-2-issue/
Nkuyubwatsi, B. (2015). Fostering collaborative investment in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). In D. Jansen & A. Teixeira (eds), Position papers for European cooperation on MOOCs: Overview of position papers on the opportunities and characteristics for European cooperation as presented during the HOME Conference in Porto November 2014 (pp. 44-57). Retrieved May 14, 2015, from http://home.eadtu.eu/images/Position_papers_for_European_cooperation_on_MOOCs.pdf
Nkuyubwatsi, B., Ndayishimiye, V., Ntirenganya, B.J., Umwungerimwiza, D.Y. (2015). Towards innovation in digital and open scholarship for non-rivalrous lifelong learning and supporting open learning: The case of the Open Scholars Network. eLearning Papers (44), 53-59. Retrieved November 17, 2015, from http://openeducationeuropa.eu/en/paper/teacher-s-role-educational-innovation
Ouwehand, M. (2012). OER platform. In R. Jacobi & N.V.D. Woert (eds), Trend report: Open Educational Resources 2012 (pp. 47-53). Retrieved May 14, 2015, from https://www.surfspace.nl/media/bijlagen/artikel-697-ee18ac0f1441bb158e6122818f5f589e.pdf
Ostrow, N. (2013, November 20). Online courses fail to reach poor students as richest benefit. Bloomsberg Technology. Retrieved May 13, 2015, from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-11-20/online-courses-fail-to-reach-poor-students-as-richest-benefit.html
Rodriguez, C. O. (2012). MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like courses: Two successful and distinct
course formats for Massive Open Online Courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and eLearning. Retrieved May 10, 2015 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ982976.pdf
Spinu, G. (2013). Tuition fees and living costs in France. Retrieved May 7, 2015, from
The University of Rwanda (2014). General academic regulations for open and distance learning programmes. Retrieved November 18, 2015, from http://cbe.ur.ac.rw/images/policy/Revised%20UR%20General%20Academic%20Regulations%20for%20Undergraduate%20Programmes.pdf
Thrun, S. (2012). Higher education 2.0. Retrieved May 14, 2015, from
University of Nicosia (2014). MSc. in Digital Currency. Retrieved May 12, 2015, from http://digitalcurrency.unic.ac.cy/admissions-registration/admissions-criteria
Valkenburg, W.V. (2012). An international perspective on OCW. In R. Jacobi & N.V.D. Woert (eds), Trend report: Open Educational Resources 2012 (pp.77-81). Retrieved May 14, 2015, from https://www.surfspace.nl/media/bijlagen/artikel-697-ee18ac0f1441bb158e6122818f5f589e.pdf
Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2012). Assumptions and challenges of open scholarship. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(4), 166–189. Retrieved November 17, 2015, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1313
Verstelle, M., Schreuder, M. & Jelgerhuis, H. (2014). Recognition of MOOCs in the higher
education sector. In R. Jacobi, N.V.D. Woert & H. Jelgerhuis (eds), Trend report: Open Educational Resources 2014 (pp. 24-32). Retrieved May 12, 2015, from http://www.surf.nl/binaries/content/assets/surf/en/2014/trendrapport-open-education-2014-eng.pdf
Weller, M. (2011). The digital scholar: How technology is transforming the scholarly practice. New York: Bloomsbery.
Weller, M. (2014). The battle for open: How openness won and why it doesn’t feel like
victory, London: Ubiquity Press. Retrieved May 10, 2015, from http://www.ubiquitypress.com/site/books/detail/11/battle-for-open/
Woert, N.V.D. (2012). Access, accessibility and use of Open Educational Resources. In Jacobi,
R. & Woert, N.V.D. (eds) Trend report: Open Educational Resources 2012 (pp. 35-39). Retrieved May 14, 2015, from https://www.surfspace.nl/media/bijlagen/artikel-697-ee18ac0f1441bb158e6122818f5f589e.pdf
Yuan, L. & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education.
Retrieved May 10, 2015, from http://publications.cetis.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/MOOCs-and-Open-Education.pdf
Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Learning for Development - JL4D
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).