Developing Multimedia Enhanced Content to Upgrade Science and Mathematics Subject Content Knowledge of Secondary School Teachers in Tanzania
The failure rates and lack of interest amongst students in science and mathematics in secondary schools in Tanzania is a serious problem. The Ministry of Education and Vocational Training (MoEVT) implemented the project to enhance and upgrade the pedagogical knowledge and subject content knowledge of teachers in selected difficult topics in science and mathematics at secondary education. This article reports on the process involved in the development of multimedia enhanced content that involved teachers, facilitators, and technical staff. The developed content was evaluated for its satisfaction using a sample of 72 experts that included teachers and instructors after using the content for 10 days. Generally, respondents were satisfied with the quality of the developed multimedia enhanced content. However, accuracy had minimum percentage of users’ satisfaction with 37%. This shows that the majority of the content had spelling and grammatical errors that were supposed to be corrected before producing the final product. Although this is ongoing work, we believe that the lessons learned from our efforts can be useful to similar organizations planning to develop multimedia enhanced content for educational purposes.
Albion, P. R. (1999). Heuristic evaluation of educational multimedia: From theory to practice. In 16th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, ASCILITE (pp. 9–15). Brisbane, Austrlia. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/brisbane99/papers/albion.pdf
Ardito, C., Costabile, M. F., Marsico, M. De, Lanzilotti, R., Levialdi, S., Roselli, T., & Rossano, V. (2005). An approach to usability evaluation of e-learning applications. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(3), 270–283. doi:10.1007/s10209-005-0008-6
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (1985). Content knowledge for Teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407.
Ball, D., & McDiarmid, W. (1990). The subject matter preparation of teachers. In Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 437–449). New York: Macmillan.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 1: Cognitive Domain. Chicago: David McKay Company.
Cochran, K. F. (1992). Pedagogical content knowledge: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263–271.
Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 259–274. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/248851 .
Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. (F. Edition, Ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., & Ruthven, K. (2006). Situated Expertise in Integrating Use of Multimedia Simulation into Secondary Science Teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 28(7), 701–732. doi:10.1080/09500690500404656
Holzinger, A., & Ebner, M. (2003). Interaction and Usability of Simulations & Animations: A case study of the Flash Technology. In Proceedings of Human-Compuetr Interaction INTERACT’03 (pp. 777–780). IOS Press. Retrieved from www.interact2003.org
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK )? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–20.
Koning, B. B. de, Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2011). Attention cueing in an instructional animation: The role of presentation speed. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 41–45. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.010
Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 390–397.
Metzler, J., & Woessmann, L. (2012). The impact of teacher subject knowledge on student achievement: Evidence from within-teacher within-student variation. Journal of Development Economics, 99(2), 486–496. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.06.002
MoEVT. (2007). ICT Policy for Basic Education. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
MoEVT. (2012). Report and Analysis of the Results. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Mtebe, J. S., & Raisamo, R. (2014a). A model for assessing Learning Management System Success in higher education in sub-Saharan countries. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 61(7), 1–17. Retrieved from https://www.ejisdc.org/ojs2/index.php/ejisdc/article/view/1128
Mtebe, J. S., & Raisamo, R. (2014b). Investigating perceived barriers to the use of Open Educational Resources in higher education in Tanzania. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(2), 43–65.
Murray, M., & Guimaraes, M. (2008). Animated Courseware Support for Teaching Database Design. Computing Sciences in Colleges, 24(2), 144–150.
Özden, M. (2008). The Effect of Content Knowledge on Pedagogical Content Knowledge : The Case of Teaching Phases of Matters. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 8(2), 633–646.
Samzugi, A. S., & Mwinyimbegu, C. M. (2013). Accessibility of Open Educational Resources for Distance Education Learners: The Case of The Open University of Tanzania. Huria Journal of OUT, 14(76-88).
Semali, L. (2013). The iSPACES Framework to Restructure Culturally Responsive Secondary Science Curriculum in Tanzania. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education, 8(2), 32–46.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knolewledge and Teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Education Review, 57(1), 1–21.
Siabeycius, J., & Poicin, D. (2012). How ICT can enhance the attractiveness of mathematics and physics in primary school. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 50, 101–107.
Tarigan, J. (2011). Factors influencing users satisfaction on eLearning systems. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 13(2), 177–188. Retrieved from http://cpanel.petra.ac.id/ejournal/index.php/man/article/viewArticle/18333
Thomas, O. O., & Israel, O. O. (2013). Effectiveness of Animation and Multimedia Teaching on Students ’ Performance in Science Subjects. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 4(2), 201–210.
UNESCO. (2009). Needs Assessment Study of Tanzania’s Science Education. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SC/pdf/sc_A_Needs_Assessment_Study_of_Tanzania_Science_Education.pdf
Unwin, T., Kleessen, B., Hollow, D., Williams, J., Oloo, L. M., Alwala, J., … Muianga, X. (2010). Digital learning management systems in Africa: myths and realities. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 25(1), 5–23. doi:10.1080/02680510903482033
Wang, Y.-S. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information & Management, 41(1), 75–86. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00028-4
Wieman, C., & Perkins, K. (2005). Transforming Physics Education. Physics Today, 58(11), 26–41. doi:10.1063/1.2155756
World Bank. (2014). Tanzania Science and Technology Higher Education Project Additional Financing and Restructuring. Retrieved from http://www.gtai.de/GTAI/Content/DE/Trade/Fachdaten/PRO/2014/09/Anlagen/PRO201409305014.pdf
Copyright (c) 2015 Journal of Learning for Development - JL4D
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).