Transformational Change in Delivery at Open Polytechnic, New Zealand


  • Caroline Seelig Open Polytechnic of New Zealand
  • Alan Cadwallader Open Polytechnic, New Zealand
  • Doug Standring Open Polytechnic, New Zealand



Transformation, Change, Open and Flexible Learning, Technical and Vcational training


As long ago as 1992, Greville Rumble was writing about the “competitive vulnerabilities” of single-mode distance teaching institutions [universities]. In the intervening years the challenges he described have only intensified, especially so as advancing information and communication technologies have enabled increasing numbers of campus-based tertiary institutions to enter distance learning, usually targeting the part-time adult learner market that was formerly the preserve of single-mode distance learning providers.

There are also wider and larger pressures at play. Disruptive digital technologies, globalisation of education, constrained government funding, shifting student expectations, and changes in demand for future skills, are all driving the need both to re-examine fundamental aspects of the ODFL (open, distance and flexible learning) model (as indeed they are for tertiary education more generally), and to re-consider the core ODFL principle of “learner-centricity” and what it might mean within this changing context.

The Open Polytechnic of New Zealand has recently undertaken a major programme of digital and organisational transformation to meet the changing needs of its distinctive learner constituency, and to enhance the organisation’s flexibility in responding to changing external factors. This institutional reengineering that disaggregates functions and unbundles processes and services, holds potential for both improved performance and enhanced partnering opportunities within a network of provision.


Bates, T. (2015, June 30). What can past history tell us about the Athabasca University ‘crisis’? Retrieved from

Daniel, J. S. (1998). Mega-universities and knowledge media: Technology strategies for higher education. London, England: Kogan Page.

Daniel, J. S. (2010). Mega-schools, technology, and teachers: Achieving education for all. New York, NY: Routledge.

Daniel, J. S. (2018). Open universities: Applying old concepts to contemporary challenges. Retrieved from

Eckel, P. D., & Kezar, A. J. (2003). Taking the reins: Institutional transformation in higher education. Phoenix, AZ: ACE/Oryx Press.

Garrett, R. (2018). Whatever happened to the promise of online learning? The state of global online higher education. Retrieved from

Keegan, D. (1994). The competitive advantages of distance teaching universities. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 9(2), 36–39.

Office of the Minister of Education (2018). Approach to reforms of the institutes of technology and polytechnic subsector. Retrieved from

Rumble, G. (1992). The competitive vulnerability of distance teaching universities. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 7(2), 31–45.

Teixeira, A. M., Bates, T., & Mota, J. (2019). What future(s) for distance education universities? Towards an open network-based approach. RIED: Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 22(1), 107–236.

Wiley, D., & Hilton, J., III. (2009). Openness, dynamic specialization, and the disaggregated future of higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(5), 1–7. Retrieved from



How to Cite

Seelig, C., Cadwallader, A., & Standring, D. (2019). Transformational Change in Delivery at Open Polytechnic, New Zealand. Journal of Learning for Development, 6(1).



Invited Articles
Received 2019-01-31
Accepted 2019-01-31
Published 2019-03-20