Future Proofing Higher Education in the Pacific with Open and Flexible Learning

  • Som Naidu The University of the South Pacific
  • Keith Roberts Independent Higher Education Capacity Building Scholar and Fulbright Specialist at University of South Pacific
Keywords: Open Educational Practice, Open Educational Resources, Flexible Learning, Policy, Pacific, Fiji

Abstract

Affordable access to higher education is a major challenge for small Pacific island nations. The University of the South Pacific which is owned and governed by twelve island nations in this region plays a special role in meeting this challenge. In its fiftieth year, a few recent developments at USP provide a useful case study for how this challenge can be addressed to provide affordable access to educational opportunity for residents of twelve Pacific Island nations in various stages of development.

The island nations served by the University of the South Pacific are spread over 33 million square kilometers of the Pacific, with several official languages and many more indigenous languages, and use seven distinct currencies. As USP celebrates its fiftieth year in 2018, it has embarked upon two specific initiatives that will enable the university to map out a pathway for the future of education for the next generation and within the context of current and new strategies for the design and implementation of meaningful education throughout the member nations.

These initiatives are the development of a flexible learning policy and an Open Education Resources policy. Taking pages from the fields of Technology, Education (Learning and Teaching), and Design, these two USP policies seek to “future proof” the university for the next generation and others after that. Being future proofed means being able to stand the test of time in the face of changing contexts and challenges. University policies are most effective when they are designed to withstand and accommodate prospective changes in the educational landscape.  These policies reflect agreed-upon principles that will withstand social and political changes. This paper is a commentary on the content of these policy initiatives around flexible learning and open education practices, their values and principles.

Author Biography

Keith Roberts, Independent Higher Education Capacity Building Scholar and Fulbright Specialist at University of South Pacific

Formerly a Senior Research Fellow at the Institute for International Studies in Education at the University of Pittsburgh from September 2010 until September 2017.  Also served as the Director of the Institute for Global Health Innovations at Duy Tan University in Danang, Vietnam; Vice President for Academics at Brigham Young University -Hawaii from 2000 -2008. 

 

References

Chandra, R. (2018). Foreword. In C. Latchem, Fifty years of flexible learning at the University of the South Pacific, (p. na). The University of the South Pacific Press.

Christensen, C., & Eyring. H. J. (2012). The Innovative University: Changing the DNA Of Higher Education. Paper presented at the Forum’s 2011 Aspen Symposium. Forum Futures, 47-53, https://net.educaus.edu/ir/library/pdf/ff1207s.pdf

Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and Praxis: Exploring the Use of Open Educational Practices in Higher Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096.

Latchem, C. (2018). Fifty years of flexible learning at the University of the South Pacific. The University of the South Pacific Press.

Mishra, S. (2017). Open Educational Resources: Removing Barriers from Within. Distance Education, 38:3, 369-380, https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1369350

Morris C., Aitken, F. R. G., Collins, H. M., Hughes, P. W., & Christie, D. H. (1966). Report of the higher education mission to the South Pacific. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

Naidu, S. (2016a). Mainstreaming Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning. In K.-W. Lai, S. Stein, P. Field, & K. Pratt (Eds.), Our world in your place: 30 years of distance learning and teaching at the University of Otago (pp. 92–108). Otago: University of Otago, Distance Learning Office.

Naidu, S. (2016b). The Case for Open Educational Practice. Distance Education, 37. 1-3, https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1157010

Naidu, S. (2017). How Flexible is Flexible Learning, Who is to Decide and What are its Implications? Distance Education, 38, https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.137183.

Nascimbeni, F., Burgos, D., Campbell, L. M., & Tabacco, A. (in press). Institutional Mapping of Open Educational Practices beyond use of Open Educational Resources. Distance Education 39(4), pages na.

Roberts, K. (2013). A Model for a Center for Teaching and Learning Excellence: A Catalyst for Program Improvement in Developing Institutions. Excellence in Higher Education, 4, 108-118.

Roberts, K. (2018). Community Engagement in Indian Higher Education: Financial and Partnership Trends. International Journal of Educational Development, 58, 95-105.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Weller, M. (2014). The battle for open: How openness won and why it doesn’t feel like victory. London: Ubiquity Press.

Published
2018-11-19
How to Cite
Naidu, S., & Roberts, K. (2018). Future Proofing Higher Education in the Pacific with Open and Flexible Learning. Journal of Learning for Development , 5(3). Retrieved from https://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/309
Section
Case Studies