Future Proofing Higher Education in the Pacific with Open and Flexible Learning
The island nations served by the University of the South Pacific are spread over 33 million square kilometers of the Pacific, with several official languages and many more indigenous languages, and use seven distinct currencies. As USP celebrates its fiftieth year in 2018, it has embarked upon two specific initiatives that will enable the university to map out a pathway for the future of education for the next generation and within the context of current and new strategies for the design and implementation of meaningful education throughout the member nations.
These initiatives are the development of a flexible learning policy and an Open Education Resources policy. Taking pages from the fields of Technology, Education (Learning and Teaching), and Design, these two USP policies seek to “future proof” the university for the next generation and others after that. Being future proofed means being able to stand the test of time in the face of changing contexts and challenges. University policies are most effective when they are designed to withstand and accommodate prospective changes in the educational landscape. These policies reflect agreed-upon principles that will withstand social and political changes. This paper is a commentary on the content of these policy initiatives around flexible learning and open education practices, their values and principles.
Chandra, R. (2018). Foreword. In C. Latchem, Fifty years of flexible learning at the University of the South Pacific, (p. na). The University of the South Pacific Press.
Christensen, C., & Eyring. H. J. (2012). The Innovative University: Changing the DNA Of Higher Education. Paper presented at the Forum’s 2011 Aspen Symposium. Forum Futures, 47-53, https://net.educaus.edu/ir/library/pdf/ff1207s.pdf
Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and Praxis: Exploring the Use of Open Educational Practices in Higher Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096.
Latchem, C. (2018). Fifty years of flexible learning at the University of the South Pacific. The University of the South Pacific Press.
Mishra, S. (2017). Open Educational Resources: Removing Barriers from Within. Distance Education, 38:3, 369-380, https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1369350
Morris C., Aitken, F. R. G., Collins, H. M., Hughes, P. W., & Christie, D. H. (1966). Report of the higher education mission to the South Pacific. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
Naidu, S. (2016a). Mainstreaming Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning. In K.-W. Lai, S. Stein, P. Field, & K. Pratt (Eds.), Our world in your place: 30 years of distance learning and teaching at the University of Otago (pp. 92–108). Otago: University of Otago, Distance Learning Office.
Naidu, S. (2016b). The Case for Open Educational Practice. Distance Education, 37. 1-3, https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1157010
Naidu, S. (2017). How Flexible is Flexible Learning, Who is to Decide and What are its Implications? Distance Education, 38, https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.137183.
Nascimbeni, F., Burgos, D., Campbell, L. M., & Tabacco, A. (in press). Institutional Mapping of Open Educational Practices beyond use of Open Educational Resources. Distance Education 39(4), pages na.
Roberts, K. (2013). A Model for a Center for Teaching and Learning Excellence: A Catalyst for Program Improvement in Developing Institutions. Excellence in Higher Education, 4, 108-118.
Roberts, K. (2018). Community Engagement in Indian Higher Education: Financial and Partnership Trends. International Journal of Educational Development, 58, 95-105.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weller, M. (2014). The battle for open: How openness won and why it doesn’t feel like victory. London: Ubiquity Press.
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International License.