E-Learning and Development: Lessons from Multi-Disciplinary Capacity Strengthening
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v1i3.3Keywords:
E-learning programs, developing countries, research capacity, Lessons.Abstract
This paper documents the experience and lessons from implementing an e-learning program aimed at creating multidisciplinary research capacity. It presents a case study of bringing together a multidisciplinary group of professionals on-line to learn the skills needed to be a successful researcher in the context of HIV/AIDS and food security problems in Eastern and Southern Africa. Lessons from the experience for future development of similar courses indicate that some of the factors that can enhance the success of e-learning programs in developing countries are: assessing the needs of the participants, easy access to educational technology, addressing the differing learning styles of the participants, continuous interaction and commitment of course moderators, enabling access to open access learning materials and combining various pedagogical approaches. The paper concludes that enhancing the skills of professionals in developing countries through e-learning programs is imperative to meet the human capacity needs for greater economic development and service delivery.
References
Abel, Rob. (2005). Implementing Best Practices in Online Learning, Education Quarterly. No. 3
Arthur, L., & Tait, A (2004). Too little time to learn?: Issues and challenges for those in work. Studies in the Education of Adults, 36(2) pp. 222–234.
Ally, M (2004). Foundations of Educational Theory for Online Learning. In T. Anderson (Ed.) Theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca, AB.: Athabasca University. Retrieved March 13, 2010 from: http://books.google.com/books?id=RifNwzU3HR4C&source=gbs_navlinks_s
Andrews, R., & Haythornthwaite, C. (2007). Introduction to e-learning research. In R. Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of E-learning Research (pp. 1–52). London: Sage.
Barro, R. J. (1996). “Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study.” NBER Working Paper No.5698.
Chyung, S. Y. (2001). Conducting learner analysis to adjust online instruction for your faceless learners. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning (pp. 85-90). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Denis, B, Watland, P, Pirotte, S, & Verday, N. (2004). Roles and competencies of the e-tutor, Networked Learning Conference: Lancaster University. http://www.shef.ac.uk/nlc2004/Proceedings/Contents.htm
dela Peña-Bandalaria, M. (2007). Impact of ICTs on open and distance learning in a developing country setting: the Philippine experience. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(1).
Freeman, R. (2004). Planning and implementing Open and Distance Learning systems: A handbook for decision making. Vancouver, Canada: Commonwealth of Learning.
Fukuyama, F. (2004). Nation Building, Cornell University Press. Ithaca.
Garrison, D.R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice. London: Routledge.
Gulati, S. (2008). Technology-Enhanced Learning in Developing Nations: A review, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning Volume 9, Number 1.
Holmes, B., & Gardner, J. (2006). E-Learning: Concepts and Practice. London: Sage Publications
Howell, S., P. Williams, and N. Lindsay (2003). Thirty-two Trends Affecting Distance Education: An Informed Foundation for Strategic Planning. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration , 4(3). Retrieved February 12, 2010 from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall63/howell63.html
Hubschman, B.G. (1999). How do different types of adult learners adapt to distance education? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 441-156)
Johnson, S. and Aragon, S. (2003). An instructional strategy framework for online learning environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 100.
Leary, J., & Berge, Z. L. (2006). Trends and challenges of e-learning in national and international agricultural development. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 2(2).
Mandinach, E. B. (2005). The development of effective evaluation methods for e-learning: A concept paper and action plan. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1814-1835.
Mason, R. (2006). Learning technologies for adult continuing education. Studies in Continuing Education, 28(2), 121–133.
Menchaca, M. P. and Bekele, T. A. (2008). Learner and instructor identified success factors in distance education. Distance Education, 29 (3), 231–252.
Ogunsola, A. (2010). Face-to-face Tutoring in Open and Distance Learning - The Nigerian Situation. International Journal of Open Distance Education, 20-29.
Okonkow, C.A. (2012). A needs assessment of ODL educators to determine their effective use of open educational resources. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. Vol 13. No.4., 293-312
O'Rourke, Jennifer (2003).Tutoring in Open and Distance Learning: A Handbook for Tutors. Vancouver: COL.
Potashnik, M. and Capper, J. (1998). Distance education: growth and diversity. Finance & Development, March, 35 (1), 42-46.
Robins, K., & Webster, F. (Eds.). (2002). The Virtual University? Knowledge, Markets, and Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rosenburg, M. (2001). E-learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age. New York, NY: McGrawHill.
Rovai A.P, Barnum K.T. (2003). Online course effectiveness: An analysis of student interactions and perceptions of learning. Journal of Distance Education, 18, 57–73.
Smyth, R., & Zanetis, J. (2007). Internet-based videoconferencing for teaching and learning: A Cinderella story. Distance Learning, 4(2), 61–70.
Stewart, B., Briton, D., Gismondi, M., Heller, B., Kennepohl, D., McGreal, R., & Nelson, C. (2007). Choosing Moodle: An evaluation of Learning Management Systems at Athabasca University. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 5(3).
Tait, A (2003). Reflections on student support in open and distance learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(1)
Taylor, J. C. (2001). Fifth generation distance education. Paper presented at the ICDE World Conference, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Thorpe, M. (2002). Rethinking Learner Support: The Challenge of Collaborative Online Learning. Open Learning, 17(2), 105-119.
Tobin, T. J. (2004). Best practices for administrative evaluation of online faculty. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 7(2).
UNESCO (2002). Open and Distance Learning: Trends, Policy and Strategy Considerations. Paris: UNESCO.
Veletcianos, G. & R. Kimmons, ( 2012). Assumptions and challenges of open scholarship, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Vol 13, No 4,166-189.
.
Welsh, E.T., Wanberg, C.R., Brown, K.G., & Simmering, M.J. (2003). E-learning: Emerging uses, empirical results, and future directions. International Journal of Training and Development, 7(4), 245–258.
Witworth, A. and Benson, A. (2010). Learning, Design, and Emergence: two case studies of Moodle in distance education. in G. Velestonis, Emerging technologies in Distance Education.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Accepted 2014-08-18
Published 2014-09-05
Contents of the 
