Changing our (Dis)Course: A Distinctive Social Justice Aligned Definition of Open Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v5i3.290Keywords:
social justice, Open Education, Open Educational Resources, Open Educational Practices, OEP, critical theory, definitionAbstract
This paper investigates the degree to which recent digital Open Education literature is aligned to social justice principles, starting with the first UNESCO definition of Open Educational Resources (OER). A critical analysis of 19 texts was undertaken to track dominant and alternative ideas shaping the development of Open Education since 2002 as it broadened and developed from OER to Open Educational Practices (OEP). The paper begins by outlining the method of texts selection, including defining the three principles of social justice (redistributive, recognitive and representational justice) used as an analytical lens. Next the paper sets out findings which show where and how the principles of social justice became lost within the details of texts, or in other digital agendas and technological determinist debates. Finally, a new social justice aligned definition for Open Education is offered. The aim of the new definition is to provide new language and a strong theoretical framework for equitable education, as well as to clearly distinguish the field of Open Education from mainstream constructivist eLearning.References
Beetham, H., Falconer, I., Mcgill, L., & Littlejohn, A. (2012). Open Practices: A briefing paper. JISC briefing paper. Retrieved from https://oersynth.pbworks.com/w/page/51668352/OpenPracticesBriefing
Bozkurt, A., Kilgore, W., & Crosslin, M. (2017). Bot-teachers in Hybrid Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): A post-humanist experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3273
Butcher, N. (2015). A basic guide to Open Educational Resources (OER). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11576-012-0326-2
Cape Town Open Education Declaration 10th Anniversary: Ten directions to move Open Education forward. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.capetowndeclaration.org/cpt10/img/cpt10-booklet.pdf
Couros, A. V. (2006). Examining the Open Movement: Possibilities and implications for education. University of Regina. Retrieved from http://educationaltechnology.ca/publication_files/research/Dissertation-Couros-FINAL-06-WebVersion.pdf
Cox, G., & Trotter, H. (2016). Institutional Culture and OER Policy: How Structure, Culture, and Agency Mediate OER Policy Potential in South African Universities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2523
Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and praxis: Using OEP in higher education. Retrieved April 2, 2018, from https://www.slideshare.net/cicronin/choosing-open-oeglobal-openness-and-praxis-using-oep-in-he
Cronin, C., & MacLaren, I. (2018). Conceptualising OEP: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Literature in Open Educational Practices. Open Praxis, 10(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.2.825
Dalsgaard, C., & Thestrup, K. (2015). Dimensions of Openness: Beyond the Course as an Open Format in Online Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2146
DeRosa, R., & Robinson, S. (2017). From OER to Open Pedagogy: Harnessing the Power of Open. In R. Biswas-Diener & R. S. Jhangiani (Eds.), Open: The philosophy and practices that are revolutionizing education and science. London: Ubiquity Press. Retrieved from https://www.ubiquitypress.com/site/books/10.5334/bbc/read/#epubcfi(/6/2[id001]!/4/1:0)
DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the “Digital Divide” to “Digital Inequality”: Studying Internet Use as Penetration Increases. Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Princeton University, 15, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20484
dos Santos, A. I., Punie, Y., & Muñoz, J. C. (2016). Opening up education: A support framework for higher education institutions (EUR 27938). Seville, Spain: European Union. https://doi.org/10.2791/293408
Edwards, R. (2015). Knowledge Infrastructures and the Inscrutability of Openness in Education. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(3), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1006131
Ehlers, U.-D. (2011). Extending the Territory: From Open Educational Resources to Open Educational Practices. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 15(2), 1–10. Retrieved from http://journals.akoaotearoa.ac.nz/index.php/JOFDL/article/view/64
Farrow, R., Arcos, B. D. L., Pitt, R., & Weller, M. (2015). Who are the Open Learners? A Comparative Study Profiling Non-Formal Users of Open Educational Resources. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 18(2), 50–74. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?p=current&article=707
Fraser, F. (1995). From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a “Post-Socialist” Age. New Left Review, 1(212). Retrieved from https://newleftreview.org/I/212/nancy-fraser-from-redistribution-to-recognition-dilemmas-of-justice-in-a-post-socialist-age
Friesen, N., & Murray, J. (2013). Open Learning 2.0? Aligning Student, Teacher and Content for Openness in Education. E-Learning and Digital Media, 10(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2013.10.2.200
Hodgkinson-Williams, C., & Gray, E. (2009). Degrees of Openness: The Emergence of Open Educational Resources at the University of Cape Town. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 5(5), 101–116. Retrieved from http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu//viewarticle.php?id=864
Holzer, H. J., & Neumark, D. (2006). Affirmative Action: What do we KNOW? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(2), 463–490. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20181
Keddie, A. (2012). Schooling and Social Justice Through the Lenses of Nancy Fraser. Critical Studies in Education, 53(3), 263–279.
Knox, J. (2015). Posthumanism and the Massive Open Online Course. Routledge.
Lamb, B. (2013). Bold innovations in openwashing. Retrieved April 3, 2018, from https://abject.ca/open-for-business/
Lane, A. (2013). The Potential of MOOCs to Widen Access to, and Success in, Higher Education Study. The Open and Flexible Higher Education Conference 2013 (pp. 189–203). European Association of Distance Teaching Universities. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/38881/1/Andy Lane EADTU 2013 paper.pdf
Lane, A. (2016). Emancipation through Open Education: Rhetoric or Reality? In P. Blessinger & T. Bliss (Eds.), Open Education: International perspectives in higher education (pp. 31–50). Open Book Publishers. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0103.02
Longstaff, E. (2014). The Prehistory of MOOCs: Inclusive and Exclusive Access in the Cyclical Evolution of Higher Education. Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change, 11(3), 164–184. https://doi.org/10.1179/1477963314Z.00000000028
McAndrew, P. (2010). Defining Openness: Updating the Concept of “open” for a Connected World. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, (2), 10. https://doi.org/10.5334/2010-10
Mukama, E. (2018). From policies to Implementation of Open Distance Learning in Rwanda: A Genealogical and Governmentality Analysis. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(1). Retrieved from http://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/237/291
Oliver, M. (2011). Technological Determinism in Educational Technology Research: Some Alternative Ways of Thinking about the Relationship Between Learning and Technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(5), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00406.x
Oliver, M. (2015). From Openness to Permeability: Reframing Open Education in Terms of Positive Liberty in the Enactment of Academic Practices. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(3), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1029940
Peter, S., & Deimann, M. (2013). On the Role of Openness in Education: A Historical Reconstruction. Open Praxis, 5(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.23
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rohs, M., & Ganz, M. (2015). MOOCs and the Claim of Education for All: A Disillusion by Empirical Data. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2033
Rolfe, V. (2016). Open. But not for Criticism? Opened16 Conference Presentation. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/viv_rolfe/opened16-conference-presentation
Santamaría Lancho, M., Hernández, M., Sánchez-Elvira Paniagua, Á., Luzón Encabo, J. M., & de Jorge-Botana, G. (2018). Using Semantic Technologies for Formative Assessment and Scoring in Large Courses and MOOCs. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2018(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.468
Selwyn, N. (2011). Does Technology Make Education Fairer? In Education and technology key issues and debates (pp. 92–115). New York: Continuum International Pub. Group.
Siemens, G. (2015). The Role of MOOCs in the Future of Education. In C. J. Bonk, M. M. Lee, T. C. Reeves, & T. H. Reynolds (Eds.), MOOCs and Open Education around the world (pp. xiii–xvii). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315751108
Tait, A. (2013). Distance and E-Learning, Social Justice, and Development: The Relevance of Capability Approaches to the Mission of Open Universities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(4). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i4.1526
Tait, A. (2018). Education for Development: From Distance to Open Education. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(2). Retrieved from http://www.jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/294/313
The Cape Town Open Education Declaration. (2007). Retrieved from http://www.capetowndeclaration.org/read-the-declaration
UNESCO. (2002). Forum on the impact of open courseware for higher education in developing countries: Final report. Paris. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org:80/iiep/eng/focus/opensrc/PDF/OERForumFinalReport.pdf
UNESCO. (2012). 2012 Paris OER Declaration. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/WPFD2009/English_Declaration.html
Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/381987
Watters, A. (2014). From “open” to justice. Retrieved March 28, 2017, from http://hackeducation.com/2014/11/16/from-open-to-justice
Weller, M. (2014). The battle for open: How openness won and why it doesn’t feel like victory. London: Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bam
Weller, M., Jordan, K., DeVries, I., & Rolfe, V. (2018). Mapping the Open Education Landscape: Citation Network Analysis of Historical Open and Distance Education Research. Open Praxis, 10(2), 109. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.2.822
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning as a Social System. Systems Thinker. https://doi.org/10.2277/0521663636
Wiley, D. (2007). Open Education license draft. Retrieved April 1, 2018, from https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355
Wiley, D. (2012). 2017: RIP, OER? Retrieved April 3, 2018, from https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/2177
Wiley, D. (2017a). OER-enabled pedagogy. Retrieved July 4, 2017, from https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/5009
Wiley, D. (2017b). When opens collide. Retrieved December 18, 2017, from https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/4990
Wiley, D., Bliss, T. J., & McEwan, M. (2014). Open Educational Resources: A Review of the Literature. In M. J. Spector, J.M., Merrill, M.D., Elen, J., Bishop (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 583–590). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5
Willems, J., & Bossu, C. (2012). Equity Considerations for Open Educational Resources in the Glocalization of Education. Distance Education, 33(2), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.692051
Young, I. M. (1997). Unruly Categories: A Critique of Nancy Fraser’s Dual Systems Theory. New Left Review, 1(222), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756119.ch54
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Accepted 2018-09-19
Published 2018-11-19
Contents of the 
