The Open Flip – a digital economic model for education
The advent of the internet and digital technologies has given rise to a number of new economic models. These have often been applied to education, but either through faults in the initial models or differences in the characteristics of the education sector, they have not proven to be widely applicable. The use of digital, network technologies combined with open licences is one area that has seen particular success in educational application. This field offers an economic model that has particular application to education, through the reallocation of finances to the production of openly licensed resources instead of the purchase of copyrighted ones. This has potential significant impact across a range of educational practices and beyond.
Allen, N. (2016). U.S. Labor Department Adopts Open Licensing Policy. Retrieved from http://sparcopen.org/news/2016/dol-open-licensing-policy/
Anderson, C. (2007). The long tail: How endless choice is creating unlimited demand. London: Random House. Anderson, C. (2009). Free: The future of a radical price. London: Random House.
Barber, M., Donnelly, K., & Rizv S (2103). ‘An avalanche is coming: Higher education and the revolution ahead’. The Institute of Public Policy Research. Retrieved from http://www.ippr.org/images/media/files/publication/2013/03/avalanche-iscoming_Mar2013_10432.pdf
Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Burke, L. (2015). Wanted: Uber-Ized Education. Retrieved from http://www.heritage.org/research/commentary/2015/2/wanted-uberized-education
Campbell, L. (2003). Engaging with the Learning Object Economy. In A. Littlejohn (Ed.), Reusing online resources: A sustainable approach to e-learning (pp. 35-45). London & Sterling, VA: Kogan Page.
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society, the information age: Economy, society and culture, Vol. I. Cambridge, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.
Christensen, C. (1997). The innovator's dilemma. New York: Harpers Business. Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Johnson, C. W. (2008). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns (Vol. 98). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Craig, R. (2015). College disrupted: The great unbundling of higher education. New York: Macmillan.
Cuthbert, R. (2010). Students as Customers. Higher Education Review, 42(3), 3-25.
de los Arcos, B., Farrow, R., Perryman, L.-A., Pitt, R., & Weller, M. (2014). OER Evidence Report 20132014. OER Research Hub. Retrieved from http://oerresearchhub.org/about-2/reports/
Downes, S. (2007). Models for Sustainable Open Educational Resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3. http://www.ijklo.org/Volume3/IJKLOv3p029-044Downes.pdf
Dvorak, J. (2004). The Myth of Disruptive Technology. PC Mag. Retrieved from http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,1628049,00.asp
Evans, P., & Wurster, T. S. (2000). Blown to bits: How the new economics of information transforms strategy. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Fischer, L., Hilton III, J., Robinson, T. J., & Wiley, D. A. (2015). A Multi-institutional Study of the Impact of Open Textbook Adoption on the Learning Outcomes of Post-secondary Students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(3), 159-172.
Fraser, J. (2016). Open Education for Schools – Policy & Practice. Retrieved from http://www.josiefraser.com/2016/03/oer-resources/
Green, C. (2016). K-12 OER Collaborative. Paper presented at OEGlobal Conference, Krakow, April 2016, Retrieved from http://conference.oeconsortium.org/2015/presentation/k12-oer-collaborative/
Gunn, C., Woodgate, S., & O’Grady, W. (2005). Repurposing Learning Objects: A Sustainable Alternative? Research in Learning Technology, 13(3), 189-200.
Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2015). The Sharing Economy: Why People Participate in Collaborative Consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. doi: 10.1002/asi.23552
Hilton III, J., Robinson, T., Wiley, D., & Ackerman, J. (2014). Cost-savings Achieved in Two Semesters Through the Adoption of Open Educational Resources. The International Review of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 15(2). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1700/2833
Larsen, K. & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2005). The Impact of ICT on Tertiary Education: Advances and Promises. Paper presented at the OECD/NSF/U Michigan Conference Advancing Knowledge and the Knowledge Economy, 10-11 January 2005, Washington, DC.
Lepore, J. (2014, June 23). The Disruption Machine - What the Gospel of Innovation Gets Wrong. The New Yorke. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/06/23/the-disruptionmachine
Meiszner, A., Glott, R., & Sowe, S. K. (2008). Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) Communities as an Example of Successful Open ParticipatoryLearning Ecosystems. UPGRADE, The European Journal for the Informatics Professional, 9(3), 62-68.
Open Library Humanities. (2015). Summary of OLH. Retrieved from https://about.openlibhums.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/2015-Summary-of-OLH.pdf
Raymond, E. (1999). The Cathedral and the Bazaar. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 12(3), 23-49.
Rogers, G, (2014). The Uberization of Education. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/20140603135511-20348008-the-uberization-of-education
Taleb, N. (2015). ‘An Uberized education is when…’. Retrieved from http://www.blackswanreport.com/blog/2015/09/an-uberized-education-is-when/
Weller, M. (2014). Battle for Open: How openness won and why it doesn't feel like victory. London: Ubiquity Press.
Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Learning for Development - JL4D
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).