Policies Regulating the Assignments of the Bachelor of Education Programme of Indira Gandhi National Open University: A Case Study


  • Sutapa Bose Indira Gandhi National Open University




Distance teacher education, assignment, policies, critique


This case study examines the policies formulated by the Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU), an open and distance learning university of India for regulating the practices related to the assignments of its Bachelor of Education programme. Following the examination it argues that some policies are formulated in the context of the pedagogic significance of assignments in distance education and aim to support learning, while others seem to have been formulated for coping with the financial and administrative limitations imposed by the high enrolment in the programme. It infers that the dichotomy in the policy objectives reflects the diverging perspectives of the policies that have not been reconciled during policy formulation. It also suggests the way the policies that subordinate quality to quantity can be revised.

Author Biography

Sutapa Bose, Indira Gandhi National Open University

Associate Professor , 

School of Education

Indira Gandhi National Open University,Maidan Garhi


Chetwynd, F., & Dobbyn, C. (2011). Assessment, feedback and marking guides in distance education. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and eLearning, 26(1), 67-78.

Chokwe, J.M. (2015). Students’ and tutors’ perceptions of feedback on academic essays in an open and distance learning context. Open Praxis, 7(1). Retrieved from http://www.openpraxis.org/index.php/OpenPraxis/article/view/154

Commonwealth of Learning. (2005). Creating learning materials for open and distance learning: A handbook for authors and instructional designers. Vancouver: COL.

Court, K. (2014). Tutor feedback on draft essays: Developing students’ academic writing and subject knowledge. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(3), 327-345.

Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2002). Does your assessment support your students’ learning? Retrieved from http://www.open.ac.uk/science/fdtl/documents/litreview.pdf

Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004-05). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(2). Retrieved from https://www.open.ac.uk/fast/pdfs/Gibbs%20and%20Simpson%202004-05.pdf

Government of India. (2013). Twelfth Five Year Plan, 2012–2017, Social sectors, Vol. 3. New Delhi: Sage

IGNOU (2015). B.Ed. Prospectus. Retrieved from http://ignou.ac.ins/ignou/aboutignou/school/soe/Prospectus

Koh, L. C. (2008). Refocusing formative feedback to enhance learning in pre-registration nurse education. Nurse Education in Practice, 8(4), 223-230.

Perera, L., Nguyen, H., & Watty, K. (2014). Formative feedback through summative tutorial-based assessments: The relationship to student performance. Accounting Education, 23(5), 424-442.

Segoe, B. (2013). Feedback measures as a strategy for student support in open distance learning: Can it come to the aid of weary student teachers? Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(14), 705-710.

Srivastava, M., & Reddy, V.V. (2002). Academic counseling at the Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU): Counsellors’ perceptions. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 5(1), 15-30.

Tait, J. (2004). The tutor/facilitator role in student retention. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 19(1), 97-109.

Weaver, M.R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 379-394.

Wilson, A. (2015). An exploration of tutor feedback on essays and the development of a feedback guide. The European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?p=special&sp=articles&inum=6&article=672



How to Cite

Bose, S. (2016). Policies Regulating the Assignments of the Bachelor of Education Programme of Indira Gandhi National Open University: A Case Study. Journal of Learning for Development, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v3i2.144



Case Studies
Received 2016-04-05
Accepted 2016-06-19
Published 2016-06-22