A Social Justice Framework for Understanding Open Educational Resources and Practices in the Global South
Abstract
At the heart of the open educational resources (OER) movement is the intention to provide affordable access to culturally relevant education to all. This imperative could be described as a desire to provide education in a manner consistent with social justice which, according to Fraser (2005), is understood as “parity of participation”. Drawing on her concept of social justice, we suggest a slight modification of Fraser’s framework for critically analysing ways in which the adoption and impact of OER and their undergirding open educational practices (OEP) might be considered socially just. We then provide illustrative examples from the cross-regional Research on Open Educational Resources for Development (ROER4D) project (2014-2017) to show how this framework can assist in determining in what ways, if at all, the adoption of OER and enactment of OEP have responded to economic inequalities, cultural inequities and political exclusions in education. Furthermore, we employ Fraser’s (2005) concepts to identify whether these social changes are either “affirmative” (i.e., ameliorative) or “transformative” in their economic, cultural and political effects in the Global South education context.References
Abramovich, S., & McBride, M. (2018). Open education resources and perceptions of financial value. The Internet and Higher Education, 39, 33–38. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.06.002
Adala, A. (2017). Assessing the Impact of Access to and Availability of OER on the Emergence and Extent of Open Education Practices in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Case of an ICT-Integrated Multinational Teacher Education Program in Math and Science. Presented at OEGlobal 2017, 8-10 March 2017. Cape Town, South Africa. Retrieved from https://conference.oeconsortium.org/2017/presentation/assessing-the-impact-of-access-to-and-availability-of-oer-on-the-emergence-and-extent-of-open-education-practices-in-sub-saharan-africa-the-case-of-an-ict-integrated-multinational-teacher-education-p/
Arendt, H. (1951). The origins of totalitarianism. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Inc.
Arinto, P. B., Hodgkinson-Williams, C., King, T., Cartmill, T., & Willmers, M. (2017). Research on Open Educational Resources for Development in the Global South: Project landscape. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 3–26). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1038980
Arinto, P. B., Hodgkinson-Williams, C., & Trotter, H. (2017). OER and OEP in the Global South: Implications and Recommendations for Social Inclusion. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 577–592). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1043829
Arumugam, P. V. (2016). Open Educational Resources and Cost Savings Efforts: Lessons from WOU. International Journal on Open and Distance e-Learning, 2(2), 49–60. Retrieved from http://www.ijodel.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/005_Arumugam.pdf
Baijnath, N. (2018). Learning for Development in the Context of South Africa: Considerations for Open Education Resources in Improving Higher Education Outcomes. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(2), 87–100. Retrieved from http://www.jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/299
Bhaskar, R.A. (1997 [1975]). A realist theory of science. London: Verso.
Cannell, P., Macintyre, R., & Hewitt, L. (2015). Widening Access and OER: Developing New Practice. Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, 17(1), 64–72. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5456/WPLL.17.1.64
Chae, B., & Jenkins, M. (2015). A qualitative investigation of faculty open educational resource usage in the Washington Community and Technical College System: Models for support and implementation. Washington, D.C.: Washington State Board for Community & Technical Colleges. Retrieved from https://oerknowledgecloud.org/sites/oerknowledgecloud.org/files/FINAL_OER_USE_WA_CTC.pdf
Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. L. (2016). Theory from the South: Or, how Euro-America is evolving toward Africa. New York: Routledge.
Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in Social Science. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Cox, G., & Trotter, H. (2017). Factors Shaping Lecturers' Adoption of OER at Three South African Universities. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 287–347). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.601935
Crissinger, S. (2015, October 21). A Critical Take on OER Practices: Interrogating Commercialisation, Colonialism and Content. The library with the lead pipe. Retrieved from http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2015/a-critical-take-on-oer-practices-interrogating-commercialization-colonialism-and-content/
Czerniewicz, L. (2016). Student Practices in Copyright Culture: Accessing Learning Resources. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 171–184.
Czerniewicz, L., Deacon, A., Walji, S., & Glover, M. (2017). OER in and as MOOCs. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 349–386). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.604414
de Oliveira Neto, J. D., Pete, J., Daryono & Cartmill, T. (2017). OER Use in the Global South: A Baseline Survey of Higher Education Instructors. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 69–118). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.599535
Epstein, W. (2001). Critical Analyses. In Thyer, B. A. The handbook of social work research methods (pp. 413–424). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd. DOI: 10.4135/9781412986182
ETUCE-EFEE-COMMUNIA (2018, April, 11). Joint Conclusions from the ETUCE-EFEE-COMMUNIA Conference on Copyright in Higher Education and Research in the EU. Retrieved from https://www.csee-etuce.org/images/attachments/Joint-Conclusions-ETUCE-EFEE-COMMUNIA_Copyright-conference.pdf
Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991
Fraser, N. (2005). Reframing Justice in a Globalizing World. New Left Review, 36, 69–88. Retrieved from https://newleftreview.org/II/36/nancy-fraser-reframing-justice-in-a-globalizing-world
Fraser, N. (2009). Feminism, Capitalism and the Cunning of History. New Left Review, 56, 97–117. Retrieved from https://newleftreview.org/II/56/nancy-fraser-feminism-capitalism-and-the-cunning-of-history
Fraser, N. (2012). On Justice. New Left Review, 74, 41–51. Retrieved from https://newleftreview.org/II/74/nancy-fraser-on-justice
Goodier, S. (2017). Tracking the Money for Open Educational Resources in South African Basic Education: What we don’t Know. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.2990
Hendricks, C., Reinsberg, S., & Rieger, G. (2017). The Adoption of an Open Textbook in a Large Physics Course: An Analysis of Cost, Outcomes, Use, and Perceptions. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4), 78–99. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/3006
Hilton III, J. (2016). Open Educational Resources and College Textbook Choices: A Review of Research on Efficacy and Perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 573–590. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11423-016-9434-9
Hodgkinson-Williams, C., & Arinto, P. B. (Eds.) (2017). Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South. Cape Town & Ottawa: African Minds, International Development Research Centre & Research on Open Educational Resources. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1038980
Hodgkinson-Williams, C., Arinto, P. B., Cartmill, T., & King, T. (2017). Factors Influencing Open Educational Practices and OER in the Global South: Meta-synthesis of the ROER4D project. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 27–67). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1037088
Karunanayaka, S. P., & Naidu, S. (2017). Impact of Integrating OER in Teacher Education at the Open University of Sri Lanka. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 459–498). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.600398
Kasinathan, G., & Ranganathan, S. (2017). Teacher Professional Learning Communities: A Collaborative OER Adoption Approach in Karnataka, India. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 499–548). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.601180
Lawrence, C. N., & Lester, J. A. (2018). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Adopting Open Educational Resources in an Introductory American Government Course. Journal of Political Science Education, 1-12. DOI: 10.1080/15512169.2017.1422739
McAndrew, P., & Cropper, K. (2011). Open Educational Resources and Intellectual Property rights. Moscow: UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education.
Mishra, S., & Singh, A. (2017). Higher Education Faculty Attitude, Motivation and Perception of Quality and Barriers Towards OER in India. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 425–458). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.602784
Nilsson, M. (2008). Rethinking Redistribution and Recognition: Class, Identity, and the Conditions for Radical Politics in the “Postsocialist” Age. New Proposals: Journal of Marxism and Interdisciplinary Inquiry, 2(1), 31-44. Retrieved from https://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/newproposals/article/view/119/235
Oates, L., Goger, L. K., Hashimi, J., & Farahmand, M. (2017). An Early Stage Impact Study of Localised OER in Afghanistan. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 549–573). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.600441
Olakulehin, F., & Singh, G. (2013). Widening Access Through Openness in Higher Education in the Developing World: A Bourdieusian Field Analysis of Experiences from the National Open University of Nigeria. Open Praxis, 5(1), 31-40. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/130656/
Orwenjo, D. O. & Erastus, F. K. (2018). Challenges of Adopting Open Educational Resources (OER) in Kenyan Secondary Schools: The Case of Open Resources for English Language Teaching (ORELT). Journal of Learning for Development, 5(2), 148-162. Retrieved from http://www.jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/282/317
Pande, J. (2018). Opportunities and Challenges in the Adoption of Open Educational Resources for Course Development: A Case Study of Uttarakhand Open University. International Journal of Information Technology, 10(3), 339-347. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs41870-018-0126-z
Pina, A. A., & Moran, K. A. (2018). Effects of an Open Educational Resource initiative on Students, Faculty and Instructional Designers. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 11(2). Retrieved fromhttps://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer212/pina_moran212.html
Phelan, L. (2012). Politics, Practices, and Possibilities of Open Educational Resources. Distance Education, 33(2), 279-282. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.692070
ROER4D (Research on Open Educational Resources for Development). (2017). Spotlight on OER Policy in the Global South: Case studies from the Research on Open Educational Resources for Development (ROER4D) project. Cape Town. Research on Open Educational Resources for Development. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.844695
Sáenz, M. P., Hernandez, U., & Hernández, Y. M. (2017). Collaborative Co-creation of OER by Teachers and Teacher Educators in Colombia. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 143–185). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.604384
Tait, A. W. (2018). Education for Development: From Distance to Open Education. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(2), 101–115. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/294
Toledo, A. (2017). Open Access and OER in Latin America: A Survey of the Policy Landscape in Chile, Colombia and Uruguay. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 121–141). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.602781
Westermann Juárez, W., & Venegas Muggli, J. I. (2017). Effectiveness of OER use in First-year Higher Education Students' Mathematical Course Performance: A Case Study. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 187–229). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.601203
Willems, J., & Bossu, C. (2012). Equity Considerations for Open Educational Resources in the Glocalization of Education. Distance Education, 33(2), 185–199. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01587919.2012.692051
Wolfenden, F., Auckloo, P., Buckler, A., & Cullen, J. (2017). Teacher Educators and OER in East Africa: Interrogating Pedagogic Change. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 251–286). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.600424
World Bank. (2017). World Development Indicators 2017. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/26447
Zagdragchaa, B., & Trotter, H. (2017). Cultural-historical Factors Influencing OER Adoption in Mongolia's Higher Education Sector. In C. Hodgkinson
Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and Impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 389–424). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.599609
Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Learning for Development - JL4D
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Contents of the 