Distance Learner’s Perspective on User-friendly Instructional Materials at the University of Zambia

Francis Simui, Kasonde Mundende, Godfrey Mwewa, Fabian Kakana, Prof. Boniface Namangala

Abstract


This case study focuses on print-based instructional materials available to distance education learners at the University of Zambia. Using the Visual Paradigm Software, we model distance education learners’ voices into sociograms to make a contribution to the ongoing discourse on quality distance learning in lowly resourced communities. The key finding shows that out of the four modules (PEM 2082, PEM 2061, PEM 2071, PEM 3122) engaged in, learners rated PEM 2082 as the most user-friendly module at 65.9% while PEM 3122 was rated least at 2.3%. Emerging from this study are the ten elements that instructional designers will need to re-consider some of which are: (i) presentation and layout of content; (ii) use of interactive language; and (iii) inclusion of real life situations. In view of the foregoing, it is recommended that the university adheres to ODL instructional design fundamentals in all its instructional materials as a means to improved quality distance learning.


Keywords


Instructional materials, User-friendly module, Distance Learning, University of Zambia

Full Text:

HTML ePub PDF

References


Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Tamin, R., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of Three Types of Interaction Treatments in Distance Education. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1243–1289. Retrieved from https://www.zotero.org/groups/distance_education/items/itemKey/Q595PPUT

Celikoz, N. (2010). Basic Factors that Affect General Academic Motivation Levels of Candidate Preschool Teachers. Education, 131(1), 113-127. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042809002432

Chakwera, E., & Saiti, F. (2005). Training Teachers Through The Distance Mode: The Experience Of Domasi College of Education In Malawi. Domasi College of Education. Malawi. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.482.6658&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Coleman, M., & Anderson, L. (2000). Managing Resources and Finance in Education. Sage Publications Incorporated, Thousand Oaks, California.

Commonwealth of Learning (2005), Planning Open and Distance Learning Systems: A Handbook for Decision Makers. Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning. Retrieved from

http://www.saide.org.za/sites/default/files/course_design/odlinstdesignHB.pdf

Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc. Retrieved from

https://www.google.co.zm/#q=Research+design:+Qualitative%2C+quantitative+and+mixed+methods+approaches.pdf

Denscombe, M. (2003). Ground Rules for Good Research: A 10 Points for Social researchers. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Elen, J., & Clarebout, G. (2001, October). Instructional design, towards consolidation and validation. Interactive Educational Multimedia: 1–11.

Freeman, R. (2004). Planning Open and Distance Learning Systems: A Handbook for Decision Makers. Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning. Retrieved from

http://dspace.col.org/bitstream/handle/11599/85/odlplanningHB.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Frey, N,. & Fisher, D. (2010). Motivation Requires a Meaningful Task. English Journal, 100(1), 30-36.

Gaskell, A., & Mills, R. (2014). The quality and reputation of open, distance and e-learning: What are the challenges? Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29(3), 190-205, DOI: 10.1080/02680513.2014.993603. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02680513.2014.993603?journalCode=copl20

Halling, S., Leifer, M., & Rowe, J.O. (2006). Emergence of the dialogal approach: Forgiving another. In C. T. Fischer (Ed.), Qualitative Research Methods for Psychology: Introduction through Empirical Studies. New York: Academic Press.

Kühl, T., & Eitel, A. (2016). Metacognition Learning 11: 1. doi:10.1007/s11409-016-9154-x

Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11409-016-9154-x

Kuruba, G. (2004). Course material development and delivery in distance education in Botswana. PanCommonwealth Forum on Open Learning. Retrieved from http://www.col.org/pcf3/Papers/PDFs/Kwa n_Angela.pdf  

Moore, M.G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–6. Retrieved from http://aris.teluq.uquebec.ca/portals/598/t3_moore1989.pdf

Murphy, D. (2000). Instructional Design for Self-Learning for Distance Education. Vancouver, BC: Commonwealth of Learning. Retrieved from http://oasis.col.org/handle/11599/64

Padhi, N. (2004). Developing a Model for ISO9000:2000 Certification of Course Material Development in Open and Distance Learning: An Indian Study. PanCommonwealth Forum on Open Learning. Retrieved from http://www.col.org/pcf3/Papers/PDFs/Padhi _N.pdf.  

Palmer, D. (2007). What Is the Best Way to Motivate Students in Science? Teaching Science. The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 53(1), 38-42.

Peat, J., & Helland, K. (2002). Perceptions of Distance Learning and the Effects on Selection Decisions, (Unpublished).  Rahman, M.H. (2015). Learning Assessment in a Self-Learning Material. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 6(3) 10. Retrieved from http://www.ijonte.org/FileUpload/ks63207/File/10.rahman.pdf


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International License.