2021 VOL. 8, No. 1
Abstract: Open Educational Resources (OER) are geared towards promoting accessibility to education and to help overcome certain constraints to education associated with traditional ways of learning. However, these OERs can only be successfully rolled out and utilised in environments already enjoying certain infrastructural empowerments, including teacher-preparedness, availability of equipment to allow use of OERs and learner exposure and knowhow. This poses a major hurdle in many public and private schools in Kenya, which are in far-flung areas without electricity, mobile-phone connectivity, Internet services and serviceable roads that allow movement to a cyber cafe where Internet services may be accessed at a fee. These difficulties are encountered by both teachers and their learners. This paper seeks to discuss the challenges faced in implementation of OERs, especially by the teachers who are expected to sensitise learners to the availability and utilisation of OERs, while they themselves are either unaware of them, poorly trained to handle them or are under-facilitated to carry out their mandate. The study was carried out in Tharaka-Nithi County, Kenya. The county was chosen because challenges related to OER have been reported there. The county has 104 secondary schools. A sample size of 45 schools representing 20% of the respondents was considered sufficient for the study. A questionnaire was used to obtain data on the teachers’ ICT competencies, their awareness of and attitudes towards OER and the challenges they faced in the implementation of OER. The study found that utilisation of OER stands at about 3% as a result of ignorance regarding OER or a negative attitude towards them, poor ICT skills amongst the teachers and poor or inadequate resources within and around the schools.
Keywords: Open Educational Resources (OER), educational infrastructure, teacher competence.
As part of youth empowerment programmes in the country, the government of Kenya, through the Communications Commission of Kenya (CCK), has aggressively set out to improve digital communications structures countrywide. This has especially been emphasised in education institutions. As a necessary support, the government, through the Last Mile initiative, has also made efforts to increase electricity connectivity countrywide to increase access to electronic devices, especially for youth. As a matter of policy there are efforts to connect primary and secondary schools in even the remotest parts of Kenya. In the last two years alone, the government has ensured that nearly 70% of Kenyan public primary schools, up from about 20%, are connected to electricity, thereby, facilitating the laying and use of ICT networks and other infrastructure (Orwenjo & Erastus, 2018). The Kenya Institute of Curriculum Development (KICD) has embraced OER in instruction and, in conjunction with the Ministry of Education, is in the process of rolling out a new Competence Based Curriculum (CBC) which advocates for critical thinking, creativity and digital literacy. By policy, secondary schools are required to have mandatory computer classes for all learners and funds have been provided to ensure Internet connectivity, at least within the school compound, with a view to creating avenues for use of OERs.
The Cape Town Open Education Declaration exalts the availability of OERs, free for all to use in a world where each person on earth can access and contribute to the sum of all human knowledge. However, the declaration goes on to acknowledge that there are hurdles in the utilisation of OER resources and their integration in promoting instruction and learning. This paper discusses these and other barriers that have hampered the utilisation of OERs in educational institutions in Tharaka-Nithi County.
Tharaka-Nithi County is one of the 47 administrative counties in Kenya introduced with the promulgation of a new constitution in 2010. It is in the eastern parts of Kenya. Geographically, the county features extremes in land and climatic conditions: zones with fertile, arable lands with climatic conditions conducive for agriculture on one hand, and zones with arid or semi-arid lands with hostile climatic conditions on the other. However, in all these zones we have primary and secondary schools with students competing for the same opportunities.
In Kenya schools are categorised as National, Extra-county, County or Sub-County schools. National schools are the top schools; they enrol students who score the highest marks in the Kenya Certificate of Primary Education (KCPE), the Kenyan national exam taken at the end of primary school learning. They have to admit students from all parts of the country, following some specific guidelines.1 All of them are boarding schools and usually they are primed with human and physical resources and have enough infrastructural facilities, either through direct government funding or through stakeholder participation.2 There are only two national schools in Tharaka-Nithi County, Ikuu Boys and Chogoria Girls national schools.
Extra-county schools admit above-average, same-sex students from within the county and the neighbouring counties, again, according to a quota system. They have large student populations and usually enjoy sensible infrastructural support, including enough classrooms, well-equipped science laboratories, learning materials and boarding facilities. There are 23 extra-county schools in Tharaka-Nithi County.
County schools admit students from within the county only. The majority of them are boarding schools but in recent years some have admitted day scholars. Depending on the locality and stakeholder support these schools enjoy poor to fairly good learning support facilities but teacher numbers have to be supplemented through BOM3-employed teachers who take up teaching as a part-time job as they wait for a “better” job. A good number of them admit both boys and girls. There are 32 county schools in Tharaka-Nithi.
Sub-county schools are lowest in the ranks: apart from enrolling students who do not post very impressive marks in KCPE, they are also home to bright but needy students who cannot afford the higher cost of being in faraway extra-county and national schools. Many of them emerged as community initiatives in response to the Free Tuition Secondary Education (FSTE) initiative introduced by the government in 2008 to address the high cost of education and poor transition rates from primary to secondary school (Ohba, 2009). Through FTSE the government pays KES 10265 per student while parents meet costs like uniforms, lunches, transport and boarding fees for those in boarding schools. Sub-county schools accommodate many learners who cannot attend schools far away from home due to the attendant costs. They are generally poorly funded and being day schools are “mixed”; they lack amenities like running water or electricity. Being far flung and oftentimes infrastructurally difficult to access, they also suffer a constant shortage of teachers, despite a hardship allowance paid out monthly to teachers who serve in the remote areas of the county, and many times learners have to settle for inexperienced, oftentimes untrained BOM-employed teachers. These schools mostly have semi-permanent shelters for classrooms and administration offices and have the barest minimum in the name of science laboratories, though, they are an absolute necessity for preparation for the final course exam, Kenya Certificate of Secondary Examination (KCSE) which has practical exams in Biology, Chemistry and Physics. There are 47 sub-county schools in the county.
Open educational resources (OER) are freely accessible, openly licensed text, media, and other digital assets that are useful for teaching, learning, and assessing as well as for research purposes. The term Open Educational Resources first came into use at a conference hosted by UNESCO in 2002 and was defined as “the open provision of educational resources, enabled by information and communication technologies, for consultation, use and adaptation by a community of users for non-commercial purposes” (Johnstone, 2005). OER designates teaching, learning and research materials in any medium, digital or otherwise, that reside in the public domain or have been released under an open license that permits no-cost access, use, adaptation and redistribution by others with no or limited restrictions. The definition of OER now most often used is: “open educational resources are digitised materials offered freely and openly for educators, students and self-learners to use and reuse for teaching, learning and for research” (UNESCO).
OER provide an alternative to the rising costs of education — it is a movement in education that seeks to counter costly, commercially produced learning content, typically textbooks, with publicly accessible content that is licensed so that it can be freely distributed and shared. It alleviates the burden of student debt while providing opportunities to students who might not otherwise be able to afford or access learning materials. In response to the effectiveness of OER compared to traditional commercial textbooks, research now indicates that OER are equally or more effective (UNDP, 2016).
Increased access to the Internet and computing devices by individuals and schools have been instrumental to the growth and institutionalization of the movement toward Open Educational Resources. In explaining the concept of the openness of resources, Materu (2004) emphasises free availability over the Internet and as few restrictions as possible on the use of the resource, whether technical, legal or price barriers. On the other hand, Downes (2006) argues that the concept of ‘open’ entails, at a minimum, no cost to the consumer or user of the resource and questions whether certain resources that require registration or subscription membership or even a small fee to access can indeed be called open. In the technical domain, Tuomi (2006) posits that technical constraints, such as lack of interoperability and the unavailability of technical specifications can limit openness, where those who conceptualise OER fail to put into account different user system interfaces, or where learning resources that can be used are located behind passwords in learning management systems and not available to external users.
The Cape Town Open Education Declaration notes that by use of OERs, “Educators worldwide are developing a vast pool of educational resources on the Internet, open and free for all to use. These educators are creating a world where each and every person on earth can access and contribute to the sum of all human knowledge. Educators, learners and others who share this belief are gathering together as part of a worldwide effort to make education both more accessible and more effective.” However, the declaration goes on to acknowledge that there are hurdles in the utilisation of OER resources and their integration in promoting instruction and learning. Part of these include lack of awareness amongst educators as well as lack of government support towards implementation, borne out of ignorance or lack of conviction about the usefulness of the resources. This paper discusses these and other barriers that have hampered the utilisation of OER in educational institutions in Tharaka-Nithi County, Kenya.
Data analysis for this paper was done against the background of two theories: Human Capital theory (Schultz, 1981), and Educational Production Functions (Coleman, 1966). Human Capital theory posits that human capital consists of knowledge, skills and abilities of the people employed in an organisation. Bontis, Crossan and Hulland (2001) define human capital as the individual knowledge stock of an organisation as represented by its employees — the human factor in the organisation; the combined intelligence, skills and expertise that give the organisation its distinctive character. Competence includes skills and education, while attitude covers the behavioural component of the employees’ work. Intellectual agility enables one to change practices and to think of innovative solutions to problems. Human capital, therefore, signifies any stock of knowledge or characteristics the worker has, either innate or acquired, that contribute to his or her productivity. This theory has been employed in this paper in commentaries on the abilities of teachers to utilise and implement OER in instruction. The Education Production Function theory, as applied in education, examines the relationship among the different inputs into the educational process and outcomes of the process. It relates various inputs affecting a student’s learning, for example, schools, families, peers and neighbourhoods, to measured outputs including subsequent labour market success, college attendance, graduation rates, and, most frequently, standardised test scores. This theory has been applied in this paper with regard to data related to the availability of teaching/learning resources and the infrastructural support within and around the school.
This study was guided by two research questions:
The study was located in Tharaka-Nithi County, Kenya. This was a quantitative research study that employed a descriptive research design. The study population comprised teachers in all the 104 secondary schools in the county. Through stratified sampling, four extra county schools, five county schools and six sub-county schools were selected for the study. However, the two national schools in the county were purposively included in the study. From each school, four teachers (each from Form One to Form Four) were randomly selected. In total 68 teachers participated in the study. They all had the requisite qualification to teach in Kenyan secondary schools — either a diploma or a bachelor’s degree in their areas of specialisation. Their ages ranged from 24-55 years and their teaching experience varied from 3-25 years.
The study used structured questionnaires to collect primary data. The questionnaires were tailored to capture information on teachers’ levels of education, their ICT competencies, adequacy and state of facilities within the school and supporting infrastructure in the schools. Faculty members who are experts in educational technology reviewed the questionnaire to improve on its face and content validity. To improve on its reliability, the questionnaire was piloted in the neighbouring Embu County which has similar characteristics as Tharaka-Nithi County. The questionnaire was responded to through a face-to-face interaction with the respondents. The data collected was cleaned up and keyed in for analysis aided by the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 22 for Microsoft Windows.
The study’s findings are presented and discussed under the following themes: teacher-based challenges and resource-based challenges in the implementation of OER in Tharaka-Nithi County following Research Questions 1 and 2, respectively.
Lack of Awareness
An overwhelming majority (92.4%) of the teachers were unaware of OER. Having not been beneficiaries of such resources themselves they came into the field with a mindset fixated on traditional texts as the only source of educational learning. This was especially the case with teachers who had been in service for over fifteen years. They admitted to knowing that there is a lot of information on just about everything on the Internet but they were not aware that part of that information could actually help them in delivering their subject content to their learners. These finding are similar to those of a study by Bateman (2006) amongst university students and lecturers, whereby, nearly every respondent was ‘unfamiliar’ with the concept of OER.
Teachers’ ICT Skills
Slightly more than half (52%) of the respondents had basic computer skills and rated their computer skills as either good or fair. The younger teachers formed the bulk of this group. Almost half (48%) of the respondents admitted to having very poor ICT skills. However, they could operate their smart mobile phones. These included the older teachers who also had been in service for many years. Of the computer literate teachers, 88% were self-taught, especially out of necessity, when pursuing higher education. Teachers who had pursued post-graduate studies, both the younger and the older ones, had better ICT skills because it was a necessary skill in the pursuit of their studies. As a result, their ICT abilities were selective, based on what was relevant during their studies. While some were proficient at Microsoft Word applications, they were incompetent at MS Excel or MS PowerPoint.
One hurdle to the implementation of OER was the poor attitude some teachers had towards them. Even in the schools with operational computers and the Internet, 63% of the teachers reported viewing the setting up of classes for OER utilisation as an unnecessary bother, because they had to make prior arrangements to access computer rooms that were inadequate and move their students from their regular classrooms. Sometimes, they reported, the computer room attendants were not cooperative, as this exercise required extra attention on their part. In addition, 38% of teachers who tried to use OERs reported being victims of negative attitudes from their colleagues. This came, especially from the older colleagues with poor ICT skills, who equated use of OERs by the younger teachers as a way to show-off their ICT skills.
Incompatibility with KCSE Syllabus
Although 33% of the respondents were aware of OER, more than three quarters of them rarely, or never, used them. When asked why they did not use OER in spite of being aware of them, one, a teacher of English and Literature, and also a beneficiary of Open Resources for English Language Teaching (ORELT) training, said, “No time. I am always trying to cover the syllabus using the prescribed texts from the Ministry of Education.” The Ministry of Education, through the Kenya Institute of Education (KIE), approves course books and syllabus content for all subjects taught in primary and secondary schools. In turn, the Kenya National Examination Council (KNEC) is mandated to set national exams based on this content. The points of emphasis in the KCSE syllabus are different from those in the OER materials and, therefore, this incompatibility discourages teachers from using OER because they might view them as a waste of precious time.4 This problem has been escalated by the current score-based syllabus that has seen instruction and learning in Kenyan schools reduced to a drill to pass the national exams, a problem that is hoped to be remedied by the introduction of the Competence Based Curriculum, CBC.5 Teachers who had exposure to ORELT materials judged the ORELT materials as being shallow in content as compared to the KIE approved textbooks.
Open Education Resources are supported by relevant infrastructure. As Bateman (2006) observes OER are open and free only theoretically because, in reality, especially in the developing world, these resources are neither open nor free to those unable to access the basic yet necessary infrastructure: electricity, computers with affordable software and the Internet. Challenges encountered in the implementation of OERs in Tharaka-Nithi County are discussed hereunder.
Lack of Power Connectivity
Despite efforts to improve electricity connectivity countrywide, this has not been realised in many parts of the country. More than a fifth (22%) of the schools are not connected to the national grid. This is especially the case in the arid Tharaka sub-county. The majority of the schools without electricity in the county are in this area. The lack of electricity meant that schools could not buy computers, as indicated by 89% of the teachers. Thirteen percent of the schools use generators as a power source but these are switched on at particular times, mainly for two to three hours for evening preparations and for two hours just before dawn for the benefit of the boarding students. The respondents cited the impossibility of using generators to run computers for any OER classes, and so many of these schools do not have computer classes. The lack of a reliable power supply also means teachers used their mobile phones sparingly, because teachers usually must pay for recharging fees in the nearest facility where power is available. This discouraged them from using their mobile phones for any OER interactions.
Inadequate School Facilities
Sub-county schools are poorly funded and under-facilitated day schools have the bare minimum in terms of basic school amenities. Many of these schools have semi-permanent structures for classrooms, staff rooms, and administrative offices. Many are in areas that have no electricity, which means that teachers and students have no access to even a cyber cafe. Kamacabi secondary school in Tharaka, for example, is 21 km away from the nearest market that enjoys electricity services. Gaciongo secondary school has electricity and teachers admitted to having a computer room with a few computers, which only the computer lessons’ teacher has access to. Teachers from certain county and sub-county schools declared that they had some computers from the government which are, however, in a store because their schools had yet to build permanent rooms where they could be placed for access. This was a common problem because, out of security concerns, permanent and customised facilities were needed for the placement of computers, yet there were no resources to build these facilities. In both of the national schools, where we expect resources to be adequate or nearly adequate, the ratio of computer to students is 1:40. In a girls’ extra-county school in a semi-urban area and which enjoys Internet connectivity, there is an average of 55 students per class but there is only one computer room with 17 working computers. This means that at least three students must share one computer whenever they have computer lessons, reducing the individual interaction and therefore learning effectiveness, one of reasons the teachers cited for their reluctance to take students to the computer laboratory. With such a situation computer accessories, like overhead projectors, video and audio players and cassettes, all of which are meant to aid and promote use of OER, are obviously out of reach for these schools.
Poor ICT Connectivity
Over 70% of the teacher respondents admitted to having both power and some computers in their schools. However, in many schools in the Tharaka area there was no mobile phone signal or Internet connectivity. Government efforts to lay an underwater fibre optic cable that has subsequently seen increased Internet connectivity and speed to 15 Mbps throughout the country were yet to reach these extremely remote areas. Even in schools that have computer facilities and Internet service another major hurdle was that Internet connectivity was limited only to the administrative offices. Some innovative teachers used their private modems to access information but used them only sparingly because they were expensive to fund. Some teachers in schools with limited connectivity cited uncooperative staff as a reason they are reluctant to seek out OER in such environments where only the school secretary’s computer, for example, is Internet-serviced.
Poor Institutional Support
While discussing the use of OER in universities, Bateman (2006) laments the lack of concrete structures to see to their implementation. This is replicated in high schools; while the Ministry of Education through the KICD had embraced the use of OER, they have not, however, set a framework for their utilisation, nor in empowering staff through focused training, in accommodating OER in the timetable nor in serious resource mobilisation. Often it is individual institutions or teachers who work out a criterion for their use and often with little regard to the consistent use, sustainability, or future role of OER. On the ground, individual institutions also fail to offer teachers the requisite support for the use of OER in classroom instruction. Some science teachers who had used their modems and mobile phones for certain practical demonstrations to the students said it was too expensive to be done regularly as the schools did not refund the cost of the Internet bundles used. Seven language teachers who had attempted to use ORELT were also frustrated by the requirement to teach harmonised content across the stream even when the other streams might be handled by teachers who are not aware of OER or have no competence to handle them. Computers teachers also complained that they were able to achieve very little learning during the stipulated 40 minutes lesson especially with such few computers. Requests to have computer classes during extra but paid hours (for example, weekends) were not usually supported by the management. While some schools had extended Internet services to the staff room, management from many schools were reluctant to do this, citing costs, and yet many teachers felt that this would make access to OER and other information easier, and it would enable them to enrich their lesson content.
One thing that was very clear from the findings of this paper is that over 90% of teachers teaching in secondary schools in Tharaka-Nithi County are ignorant of the concept of OER. Furthermore, some teachers who are aware of OER lack the ICT skills to be able to effectively use them. In the light of Human Capital theory this is a pointer towards less productivity owing to lack of knowledge and expertise of the teachers, which calls for action on the part of the education managers — firstly, there is a need to do in-service training to sensitise the teachers to the existence and importance of OER. Secondly, it is imperative that this in-service training extends to equipping all teachers with a measure of ICT competencies that could ensure their participation in the utilisation of OER. In the long run this will update the workforce for more productivity.
The Education Production Function theory relates the different inputs to the educational process and outcomes of the process. The findings of this study reveal that in order to promote learning in secondary schools in Tharaka-Nithi County, there is a real need to update facilities in and around the schools to give the teachers and students an opportunity to use OER. United Nations Sustainable Development Goal No. 46 cites reasons for lack of quality education as lack of adequately trained teachers, poor conditions of schools and equity issues related to opportunities provided to rural children (UNDP, 2016). Kenya, being a member state, should show commitment to this ideal by ending the tokenism mentality evident in policy without implementation follow-up. Apart from ensuring electricity and Internet connectivity throughout the country, specifically in the extremely remote parts of Tharaka-Nithi, funding of schools should be done equitably to ensure that every school in the county has proper tuition and boarding facilities, including functional science laboratories and computer rooms. This tokenism is evident in the equipping of schools; even in schools with Internet connectivity, very little learning by way of OERs can take place in an environment where 1300 students share 30 computers as individual learners’ interaction with these computers is minimal.
By embracing the use of OER, the Ministry of Education in Kenya, through KICD, has taken a step in the right direction. However, there is a need to follow up policy with implementation: the KICD should work out a policy framework for the implementation of OER and not just leave it to individual institutions or teachers to apply them in accordance with their respective means or abilities. This should include in-service training to promote teachers’ ICT skills, developing curricula that integrate OER and equipping schools with relevant resources. In their turn teachers and other instructors should recognise and appreciate OER as a useful supplement to their traditional teaching resources. They must be willing to align themselves in the direction the educational world is going by actively updating their ICT skills and making efforts to integrate OER as they impart knowledge to their learners. Apart from steering the country in the direction of shared knowledge worldwide, this will also ensure equity of opportunities for learners countrywide, who are competing for the same opportunities regardless of the category of school they are in or the locality in which the school is situated. This fact has been forcefully brought home in the face of the world-wide COVID-19 pandemic which has virtually frozen traditional methods of instruction and learning. In Kenya, the minister for education has been at pains to explain his claim that learners are continuing their learning online when only less than 10% of the learners in both primary and secondary schools have access to any form of online learning platform. This should be a wake-up call to the government to ensure that all learning institutions in the country are upgraded and facilitated to adopt and incorporate technology in learning and instruction.
Bateman, P. (2006). Discussion Paper: The AVU Open Educational Resources (OER) architecture for higher education in Africa. OECD Expert Meeting — Barcelona.
Bontis, N., Crossan, M., & Hulland, J. (2001). Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and flows. Journal of Management Studies, 39(4).
Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Downes, S. (2006). Models for sustainable Open Educational Resources. National Research Council, Canada. http://www.oecd.org/document/32/0,2340,en_2649_33723_36224352_1_1_1_1,00.html
Johnstone, S. (2005). Open Educational Resources and Open Content, Background note. International Institute for Educational Planning, Internet Discussion Forum on Open Educational Resources, Open Content for Higher Education.
Materu, P. (2004). Open source courseware: A baseline study. The World Bank, Washington, DC.
Orwenjo, D. O., & Erastus, F. K. (2018). Challenges of adopting Open Educational Resources (OER) in Kenyan Secondary Schools: The case of Open Resources for English Language Teaching (ORELT). Journal of Learning for Development, 5(2), 148-162.
Schultz, T. W. (1981). Investing in people: The economics of population quality. University of California Press.
Tuomi, I. (2006, October). Open Educational Resources: What they are and why do they matter. http://www.oecd.org/edu/oer
United Nations Development Programme (2016). Sustainable Development Goals. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/
Dr. Ann Hildah Kinyua is a lecturer of English and Linguistics in the Department of Humanities, Chuka University, Kenya. She holds a BEd (Arts) from Kenyatta University, an MA (English) from Egerton University and a PhD in Linguistics from Chuka University. She is currently undertaking an MA in Forensic Linguistics at California University of Pennsylvania. Her main research interests are in syntax and morphology, linguistic typology, sociolinguistics and applied linguistics. She also has interest in education and pedagogical practice. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Cite this paper as: Gatakaa, A. H. G. (2021). When the trainer is untrained: Stakeholder incapacitation in implementation and utilisation of Open Educational Resources in Kenya. Journal of Learning for Development, 8(1), 171-181.