Curriculum Transaction in NIOS: Overcoming the Limitations of Packaged Instructions

Sutapa Bose

Abstract


Low learning outcomes of Indian schools and the promotion of rote learning by their instructional systems have been documented time and again. Schools are therefore required to adopt India’s National Curriculum Framework (NCF) (2005) that includes guidelines for curriculum transaction. However, the learning outcomes and the kind of learning likely to be promoted by the instructional system of open schools of India, including the National Institute of Open Schooling (NIOS) remain excluded from these deliberations. So these two aspects of NIOS have been examined and it has been inferred that the learning outcomes are unsatisfactory; the instructional system is not designed for meaningful learning; and the self learning material used for delivering instructions is a barrier to the adoption of the NCF guidelines. Thereafter it has been proposed that the personal contact programme (PCP) is the only component of the instructional system of NIOS that will lend itself to the adoption of the NCF guidelines, provided it is designed suitably. Subsequently a PCP design based on the NCF directives for organising instructional processes has been suggested.

Keywords


NIOS; Learning outcomes; instructions; rote; PCP

Full Text:

HTML ePub PDF

References


Arinto, P.B. (2007). Going the Distance: Towards a new professionalism for full-time distance education faculty at the University of the Philippines. The international review of research in open and distance learning 8(3). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/409/941

Ausubel, D. P. (1962). A subsumption theory of meaningful verbal learning and retention. The Journal of General Psychology 66, 213-244.

Baath, J.A. (1982). Distance students’ learning-emperical findings and theoretical deliberations. Distance education 3(1), 6-27.

Barron, B. &. Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teaching for Meaningful Learning: A Review of Research on Inquiry-Based and Cooperative Learning .San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. www.edutopia.org/pdfs/edutopia-teaching-for-meaningful-learning.pdf

Bielaczyc, K. & Collins, A. (1999). Learning Communities in Classrooms: A reconceptualization of Educational Practice . In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (vol. II, pp. 2 -20). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic541040.files/Bielaczyc%20and%20Collins-Learning%20Communities%20in%20Classrooms.pdf

Bouchard, P. & Kalman, L. (1998). Distance education and learner autonomy: Some theoretical implications. Actes du 15ème colloque de l’AssociationCanadienne pour l’étude de l’éducation des adultes. Université d’Ottawa. http://www.academia.edu/660366/DISTANCE_EDUCATION_AND_LEARNER_AUTONOMY_SOME_THEORETICAL_IMPLICATIONS

Brown, J.S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of

Learning. Educational Researcher 18 (1), 32-42. http://www.exploratorium.edu/ifi/resources/museumeducation/situated.html

CBSE (2012). Notification of clarifications regarding implementation of school based assessment under continuous and comprehensive evaluation - formative and summative assessments. http://tir.cbseacademic.in/webmaterial/notification/CBSE_CCE%20Feedback.pdf

Chhapiah. H. (2013, June 1).India chickens out of international students assessment programme again. The Times of India. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/news/India-chickens-out-of-international-students-assessment-programme-again/articleshow/20375670.cms

Daniel, J., Kanwar,A. & Uvalić-Trumbić,S. (2008). Achieving Quality in Distance Education. Commonwealth of Learning Resources. http://www.col.org/resources/speeches/2008presentations/Pages/2008-04-04.aspx

Education for all- The quality imperative (2005). Paris: UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001373/137333e.pdf

Examination profile, NIOS (n.d.) http://www.nios.ac.in/stastical-report/academic-examination-profile.aspx

Gohain, M.P. ( 2014, March 6). CCE has improved scores, not teaching. New Delhi: The Times of India.

Handbook for Academic Facilitators of NIOS (n.d.) http://www.nios.ac.in/media/documents/Hand%20book%20for%20Academic%20Facilitatiors-Final.pdf

Holmberg, B. (1983). Guided didactic conversation. In D. Sewart, D. Keegan & B. Holmberg (Eds), Distance education: International perspectives (pp.114-122). London: Croom Helm. http://www.c3l.uni-oldenburg.de/cde/support/readings/holm83.pdf.

Ivie, S.D. (1998). Ausubel's learning theory: An approach to teaching higher order

thinking skills. High School Journal 82 (1), 35-42. http://imet.csus.edu/imet9/281/docs/ivie_1998.pdf

Kasworm, C. E. & Yao, B. (1992). The development of adult learner autonomy and self-directedness in distance education. Paper presented as part of the 16th World Conference. International Council on Distance Education. Bangkok, Thailand. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED355453.pdf

Keegan, D. (1993).Reintegration of the teaching acts. In D. Keegan (Ed.) Theoretical principles of distance Education, ed. (p.124). New York: Routledge.

Kirkwood, A. & Price, L. (2008). Assessment and Student Learning – a fundamental relationship and the role of information and communication technologies. Open Learning 23 (1), 5-16.

Ministry of Human Resource Development (1993). Learning without Burden. Report of the National Advisory Committee Appointed by the Ministry of Human Resource Development. New Delhi: Government of India.

Moore, M.(1986). Self-Directed Learning and Distance Education. Journal of distance education 1(1),7-24. http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/307/201

Moore, M. (1997). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.) Theoretical principles of distance education, ed. (pp. 22–38). New York: Routledge. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:t-X8wvHs7xoJ:ftp://27.32.98.129/Share/_Genie%2520Timeline/0/C/Users/Wolodko/Desktop/Doctoral%2520Stuff/

Mukherjee, R. (2013). Indian Education System: What needs to change? Unlawyered. http://startup.nujs.edu/blog/indian-education-system-what-needs-to-change/

National Curriculum Framework (2005). New Delhi: NCERT.

NIOS (2012). Chairman’s Message. http://www.niosrcben.org/directormessage.php

NIOS Prospectus (2013-14). Academic courses secondary and senior secondary. http://nios.ac.in/media/documents/Prospectus%20-%202013-14.pdf

Planning Commission (Government of India) (2013). Twelfth five year plan (2012-2017) Social sectors. vol.III. New Delhi: Sage Publications. 47-124.

Quality Education Study Report (2011). Wipro and Educational Initiatives Pvt. Ltd. http://www.teindia.nic.in/e9-tm/Files/QES-Executive-Summary-High-Resolution.pdf

Sewart, D. (1993). Student support systems in distance education. Open Learning 8(3): 3-12.

The Dakar Framework of Action (2000). Paris: UNESCO.

United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF). 2000. Defining quality in Education. A paper presented by UNICEF at the meeting of the International Working Group on Education Florence, Italy. http://www.unicef.org/education/files/QualityEducation.PDF

Venkataramanan, K. (2011,December 12).Learning by rote prevalent in top schools too”, The Hindu, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-opinion/learning-by-rote--in-top-schools-too/article2707562.ece

Wedemeyer, C. A. (1971). Independent study. In R. Deighton (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Education IV (pp. 548-557). New York: McMillan.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International License.